Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorKuźniacki, Błażej
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-03T09:34:27Z
dc.date.available2019-04-03T09:34:27Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn1509-877X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/27340
dc.description.abstractThis paper essentially concentrates on a potential of an application of artificial intelligence (AI) to tax law. The main research question is as follows: whether taxpayers, tax authorities and courts may receive a support of AI in their task associated with tax law? The purpose of the article is to take an attempt to answer to that question by the analysis of the origin of AI and law, the present stage of development of AI applications to tax law, and the prospective applications of AI to tax law.en_GB
dc.description.abstractArtykuł koncentruje się przede wszystkim na potencjale zastosowanie sztucznej inteligencji do prawa podatkowego. Główne pytanie badawcze dotyczy możliwości uzyskania wsparcia ze strony sztucznej inteligencji przez podatników, organy podatkowe i sądy w zakresie stosowania prawa podatkowego. Celem artykułu jest próba odpowiedzi na to pytanie badawcze poprzez przedstawienie genezy, obecnego stanu oraz potencjału rozwojowego zastosowania sztucznej inteligencji do prawa podatkowego.pl_PL
dc.language.isoplpl_PL
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl_PL
dc.relation.ispartofseriesTax Law Quarterly; 2
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.pl_PL
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0pl_PL
dc.subjecttax lawen_GB
dc.subjectartificial intelligenceen_GB
dc.subjecttechnologyen_GB
dc.subjectfutureen_GB
dc.subjectpotentialen_GB
dc.subjectsztuczna inteligencjapl_PL
dc.subjectprawo podatkowepl_PL
dc.titleZastosowanie sztucznej inteligencji do prawa podatkowego: Spojrzenie w przeszłość, teraźniejszość i przyszłośćpl_PL
dc.title.alternativeApplication of Artyficial Intelligence to Tax Law: The Look into the Past, Present and the Futureen_GB
dc.typeArticlepl_PL
dc.page.number55-70
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniwersytet w Oslo, Ministerstwo Finansów, Departament Podatków Dochodowych
dc.referencesArntz M., Gregory T., Zierahn U., The Risk of Automation for Jobs in OECD Countries: A Comparative Analysis, OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, nr 189, maj, Paris 2016, http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5jlz9h56dvq7-en (dostęp: 1.06.2018).pl_PL
dc.referencesAshley K.D., Modeling Legal Argument: Reasoning with Cases and Hypotheticals, Artificial Intelligence and Legal Reasoning Series, Massachusetts 1990.pl_PL
dc.referencesBarak A., Purposive Interpretation in Law, New Jersey 2005.pl_PL
dc.referencesBasha R., Legal Tech Startups Have A Short History And A Bright Future, TechCrunch, 6.02.2014, https://techcrunch.com/2014/12/06/legal-tech-startups-have-a-short-history-and-a-bright-future/ (dostęp: 28.05.2018).pl_PL
dc.referencesBex F.J., Arguments, Stories and Criminal Evidence: A Formal Hybrid Theory, Dordrecht 2011.pl_PL
dc.referencesBuchanan B.G., Headrick T.E., Some Speculation about Artificial Intelligence and Legal Reasoning, „Stanford Law Review” 1970, t. 23, nr 1, listopad.pl_PL
dc.referencesCopeland B.J., Artificial Intelligence, https://www.britannica.com/technology/artificial-intelligence (dostęp: 28.05.2018).pl_PL
dc.referencesDomingos P., The Master Algorithm: How the Quest for the Ultimate Learning Machine will Remake Our World, New York 2015.pl_PL
dc.referencesDworkin R., Law’s Empire, Cambridge 1986.pl_PL
dc.referencesFillard J-P., Brain vs Computer: The Challenge of the Century, London 2017.pl_PL
dc.referencesFrey C.B., Osborne M.A., The Future of Employment: How Susceptible Are Jobs to Computerisation?, https://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/downloads/academic/The_Future_of_Employment.pdf (dostęp: 1.06.2018).pl_PL
dc.referencesGoodman B., Four Areas of Legal Ripe for Disruption by Smart Startups Law Technology Today, 16.12.2014, http://www.lawtechnologytoday.org/2014/12/smart-startups (dostęp: 28.05.2018).pl_PL
dc.referencesGoodman B., Harder J., Four Areas of Legal Ripe for Disruption by Smart Startups, Law and Technology Today, 2014, http://www.lawtechnologytoday.org/2014/12/smart-startups/ (dostęp: 1.06.2018).pl_PL
dc.referencesGordon T.F., Oblog-2: A Hybrid Knowledge Representation System for Defeasible Reasoning, [w:] Proceedings of the First International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, New York 1987.pl_PL
dc.referencesGrabmair M., Ashley K.D., Facilitating Case Comparison Using Value Judgments and Intermediate Legal Concepts, [w:] Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, New York 2011.pl_PL
dc.referencesHart H., Sachs A., The Legal Process: Basic Problems in the Making and Application of Law, W. Eskridge, P. Frickey (red.), New York 1994.pl_PL
dc.referencesIs Artificial Intelligence No Longer Cutting Edge?, https://biglawbusiness.com/is-artificial-intelligence-no-longer-cutting-edge (dostęp: 1.06.2018).pl_PL
dc.referencesKeynes J.M., Economic Possibilities for Our Grandchildren (1930), [w:] Essays in Persuasion, New York 1933, https://assets.aspeninstitute.org/content/uploads/files/content/upload/Intro_and_Section_I.pdf (dostęp: 1.06.2018).pl_PL
dc.referencesKrishna A., Fleming M., Assefa S., Instilling Digital Trust: Blockchain and Cognitive Computing for Government, [w:] Digital Revolutions in Public Finance, S. Gupta, M. Keen, A. Shah, G. Verdier (red.), Washington 2017.pl_PL
dc.referencesKuźniacki B., The Artificial Intelligence Tax Treaty Assistant: Decoding the Principal Purpose Test, „Bulletin for International Taxation” 2018, t. 72, nr 9.pl_PL
dc.referencesManyika J. et al., A Future that Works: Automation, Employment, and Productivity, the McKinsey Global Institute (MGI), styczeń 2017, https://www.mckinsey.com/~/me­dia/McKinsey/Global%20Themes/Digital%20Disruption/Harnessing%20automa­tion%20for%20a%20future%20that%20works/MGI-A-future-that-works_Full-report.ashx (dostęp: 1.06.2018).pl_PL
dc.referencesMatczak M., Three Kinds of Intention in Lawmaking, „Law and Philosophy”, online: 5.05.2017, section II.pl_PL
dc.referencesMcCarty L.T., Reflections on „Taxman”: An Experiment in Artificial Intelligence and Legal Reasoning, „Harvard Law Review” 1977, t. 90, nr 5, marzec.pl_PL
dc.referencesMcCarty L.T., Some Requirements for a Computer-based Legal Consultant, Technical Report LRP-TR-8, Laboratory for Computer Science Research, New Jersey.pl_PL
dc.referencesMcJohn S.M., Review of the „Artificial Legal Intelligence” by Pamela N. Gray, Brookfield, VT: Dartmouth Publishing Co., 1997, 12 „Harvard Journal of Law & Technology” 1998, t. 12, nr 1.pl_PL
dc.referencesMehl L., Automation in the Legal World, the conference paper, Mechanisation of Thought Processes, Teddington (England), 24–27.11.1958.pl_PL
dc.referencesMoles R.N., Definition and Rule in Legal Theory: A Reassessment of H.L.A. Hart and the Positivist Tradition, Oxford 1987.pl_PL
dc.referencesMoore M.S., The Semantics of Judging, „Southern California Law Review” 1981, t. 54.pl_PL
dc.referencesNilsson N., The Quest for Artificial Intelligence: A History of Ideas and Achievements, New York 2009.pl_PL
dc.referencesPosner R.S., The Decline of Law as an Autonomous Discipline 1962–1987, „Harvard Law Review” 1987, t. 100.pl_PL
dc.referencesRasmussen C.E., Nickisch H., Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning (GPML) Toolbox, „The Journal of Machine Learning Research” 2010, t. 11.pl_PL
dc.referencesRasmussen C.E., Williams C.K.I., Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning, Massachusetts 2006.pl_PL
dc.referencesRissland E., Examples in Legal Reasoning: Legal Hypotheticals, [w:] Proceedings of the Eighth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, San Francisco 1983, s. 90–93.pl_PL
dc.referencesSandler D., Tax Treaties and Controlled Foreign Company Legislation: Pushing the Boundaries, The Hague 1998.pl_PL
dc.referencesSergot M., The Representation of Law in Computer Programs, [w:] Knowledge-Based Systems and Legal Applications, T.J.M. Bench-Capon (red.), London 1991.pl_PL
dc.referencesShank C., I’m Sorry, Dave, I’m Afraid I Can’t Do That: How Could HAL Use Language, [w:] Hal’s Legacy: 2001’s Computer as Dream and Reality, Massachusetts 1997.pl_PL
dc.referencesSherman D.M., Expert Systems and ICAI in Tax Law: Killing Two Birds with One AI Stone, the conference paper for the Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, Vancouver 1989.pl_PL
dc.referencesSherman D.M., Reasoning in Income Tax through Logic Programming, [w:] Law, Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, A. Narayanan, M. Bennun (red.), Exeter 1998.pl_PL
dc.referencesShuey R.L., Impact on VLSI on Artificial Intelligence, [w:] VLSI Electronics Microstructure Science, N.G. Einspruch (red.), t. 7, New York 1983.pl_PL
dc.referencesSkalak D.B., Rissland E., Arguments and Cases: An Inevitable Intertwining, 1 „Artificial Intelligence and Law” 1992, t. 1.pl_PL
dc.referencesStevens Ch., Barot V., Carter J., The Next Generation of Legal Expert Systems-New Dawn or False Dawn?, [w:] Research and Development in Intelligent Systems XXVI, M. Bramer et al. (red.), London 2012.pl_PL
dc.referencesStork D.G. (ed.), Hal’s Legacy: 2001’s Computer as Dream and Reality, Massachusetts 1997.pl_PL
dc.referencesUrban T., The AI Revolution: The Road to Superintelligence, Wait By Way, 22.02.2015, https://waitbutwhy.com/2015/01/artificial-intelligence-revolution-1.html (dostęp: 1.06.2018).pl_PL
dc.referencesWilkins D.E., That’s Something I Could Not Allow to Happen, [w:] Hal’s Legacy: 2001’s Computer as Dream and Reality, Massachusetts 1997.pl_PL
dc.referencesZieliński M., Wyznaczniki reguł wykładni prawa, „Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny” 1961, t. 23, nr 4.pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorEmailblazej.kuzniacki@gmail.com
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1509-877X.02.03


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.