| dc.contributor.author | Sękowska, Jolanta | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2018-08-24T11:52:15Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2018-08-24T11:52:15Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1427-9665 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11089/25433 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This paper discusses the issue of the boundaries of incrementality in sentence-comprehension processes.The maximum incrementality, postulated as unlimited interactive sentence-comprehension models, allows anticipation and prediction top-down processing, facilitating quick interpretation of the perceived linguistic input. However, it involves a substantial strain on cognitive resources, especially at the beginning of the sentence. In addition, in the case of structures with verbs placed at the end of a sentence, unlimited interactivity keeps vast knowledge resources active until the verb and its arguments are agreed.This imposes a certain order of importance on interactive models at the same time assigned to the ongoing top-down processing, thus limiting incrementality, interactivity and the ability to anticipate. | en_GB |
| dc.language.iso | en | de_DE |
| dc.publisher | Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego | de_DE |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Germanica;13 | |
| dc.subject | sentence comprehension | en_GB |
| dc.subject | sentence processing | en_GB |
| dc.subject | incrementality | en_GB |
| dc.subject | anticipation | en_GB |
| dc.subject | inter¬activity | en_GB |
| dc.title | WIE VIEL INFORMATION KÖNNEN WIR ANTIZIPIEREN? ZUM PROBLEM DER INKREMENTALITÄT UND UNEINGESCHRÄNKTEN INTERAKTIVITÄT BEIM SATZVERSTEHEN | de_DE |
| dc.title.alternative | HOW MUCH DATA CAN WE ANTICIPATE? INCREMENTALITY AND UNLIMITED INTERACTIVITY IN SENTENCE COMPREHENSION | en_GB |
| dc.type | Article | de_DE |
| dc.rights.holder | © Copyright by Authors, Łódź 2017; © Copyright for this edition by Uniwersytet Łódzki, Łódź 2017 | de_DE |
| dc.page.number | [9]-20 | |
| dc.contributor.authorAffiliation | Maria-Curie-Skłodowska-Universität in Lublin, Institut für Germanistik und Angewandte Linguistik | |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 2449-6820 | |
| dc.references | Altmann G.T.M., Mirković J. (2009), Incrementality and prediction in human sentence processing. In: Cognitive Science, H. 33, S. 583–609. | en_GB |
| dc.references | Aoshima S., Phillips C., Weinberg A. (2004), Processing filler-gap dependencies in a headfinal language. In: Journal of Memory and Language, H. 51, S. 23–54. | en_GB |
| dc.references | Bader M., Lasser I.(1994), German verb-final clauses and sentence processing: Evidence for immediate attachment. In: Clifton Ch./Frazier L./Rayner K. (Hgg.), Perspectives on Sentence Processing, Hillsdale NJ, S. 225–242. | en_GB |
| dc.references | Bever T.G.(1970), The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In: Hayes J.R. (Hg.), Cognition and the development of language, New York, S. 279–362. | en_GB |
| dc.references | Boland J.E., Boehm-Jernigan H.(1998), Lexical constraints and prepositional phrase attachment.In: Journal of Memory and Language, H. 39, S. 684–719. | en_GB |
| dc.references | Bornkessel-Schlesewsky I., Schlesewsky M.(2009), Processing Syntax and Morphology: A Neurocognitive Perspective, Oxford. | en_GB |
| dc.references | Bresnan J.(2001) (Hg.), Lexical-Functional Syntax, Oxford. | en_GB |
| dc.references | Chomsky N.(1965), Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, Cambridge. | en_GB |
| dc.references | Chomsky N.(1981), Lectures on Government and Binding. The Pisa Lectures, Dordrecht. | en_GB |
| dc.references | Crocker M.W., Keller F.(2006), Probabilistic grammars as models of gradience in language processing. In: Fanselow G./Féry C./Vogel R./Schlesewsky M. (Hgg.), Gradience in Grammar: Generative Perspectives, Oxford, S. 227–245. | en_GB |
| dc.references | Featherston S.(2005), The decathlon model of empirical syntax. In: Kepser S./Reis M. (Hgg.), Linguistic evidence – Empirical, theoretical, and computational perspectives, Berlin, S. 187–208. | en_GB |
| dc.references | Ferreira F., Clifton Ch.(1986), The independence of syntactic processing. In: Journal of Memory and Language, Bd. 25, H. 3, S. 348–368. | en_GB |
| dc.references | Fillmore Ch.(1988), The mechanisms of “Construction Grammar”. In: Proceedings of the annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Bd. 14, S. 33–35. | en_GB |
| dc.references | Fillmore Ch., Kay P., O’Connor M.C. (1988), Regularity and idiomacity in grammatical constructions. In: Language, Bd. 64, H. 3, S. 501–538. | en_GB |
| dc.references | Frazier L.(1990), Exploring the architecture of language processing system. In: Altmann G.T.M. (Hg.), Cognitive Models of Speech Processing. Psycholinguistic and Computational Perspectives. Cambridge, S. 409–433. | en_GB |
| dc.references | Friederici A.D.(2002), Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing. In: Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Bd. 6, H. 2, S. 78–84. | en_GB |
| dc.references | Friederici A.D., Kotz S.A.(2003), The brain basis of syntactic processes: functional imaging and lesion studies. In: NeuroImage, H. 20, S. S8–S17. | en_GB |
| dc.references | Gibson E. (1991), A computational theory of linguistic processing: Memory limitations and processing breakdown, Dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University. | en_GB |
| dc.references | Goldberg A.E. (1995), Constructions. A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure, Chicago. | en_GB |
| dc.references | Gorrell P.(1995), Syntax and parsing. Cambridge u.a. | en_GB |
| dc.references | Hemforth B., Konieczny L.(2008), Sätze verstehen und produzieren. In: Müsseler J./Prinz W. (Hgg.), Lehrbuch Allgemeine Psychologie, Heidelberg, S. 505–554. | en_GB |
| dc.references | Hindle D., Rooth, M.(1993), Structural Ambiguity and Lexical Relations. In: Computational Linguistics, H. 19, S. 103–120. | en_GB |
| dc.references | Jurafsky D.(2003), Probabilistic modelling in psycholinguistics: Linguistic comprehension and production. In: Bod R./Hay J./Jannedy S. (Hgg.), Probablistic Linguistics, Cambridge, MA, S. 39–96. | en_GB |
| dc.references | Kamide Y., Altmann G.T.M., Haywood S.L. (2003), The time-course of prediction in incremental sentence processing: Evidence from anticipatory eye movements. In: Journal of Memory and Language, H. 49, S. 133–156. | en_GB |
| dc.references | Kamide Y., Mitchell D.C. (1999), Incremental pre-head attachment in Japanese parsing. In: Language and Cognitive Processes, H. 14, S. 631–662. | en_GB |
| dc.references | Kempen G., Harbusch K. (2005), The relationship between grammaticality ratings and corpus frequencies: A case study into word order variability in the midfield of German clauses. In: Kepser S./Reis M.(Hgg.), Linguistic evidence – Empirical, theoretical, and computational perspectives, Berlin, S. 329–349. | en_GB |
| dc.references | Lombardo V., Sturt P. (2002), Incrementality and lexicalism: A treebank study. In: Merlo P./Stevenson S.(Hgg.), The Lexical Basis of Sentence Processing. Formal, computational and experimental issues. Amsterdam, Philadelphia, S. 137–156. | en_GB |
| dc.references | MacDonald M.C., Pearlmutter N.J., Seidenberg M.S. (1994), The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. In: Psychological Review, Bd. 101, H. 4, S. 676–703. | en_GB |
| dc.references | McRae K., Spivey-Knowlton M.J., Tanenhaus M.K.(1998), Modeling the Influence of Thematic Fit (and Other Constraints) in On-line Sentence Comprehension. In: Journal of Memory and Language, Bd. 38, H. 3, S. 283–312. | en_GB |
| dc.references | Miyamoto E.T.(2002), Case markers as clause boundary inducers in Japanese. In: Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, Bd. 31, H. 4, S. 307–347. | en_GB |
| dc.references | Naumann S., Langer H.(1994), Parsing – Eine Einführung in die maschinelle Analyse natürlicher Sprache, Stuttgart. | en_GB |
| dc.references | Pablos L. (2011), Rich agreement in Basque: Evidence for pre-verbal structure building. In: Yamashita H./Hirose Y./Packard J.L. (Hgg.), Processing and Producing Head-final Structures, Dordrecht u.a., S. 3–22. | en_GB |
| dc.references | Pickering M.J., Traxler M., Crocker M.W.(2000), Ambiguity resolution in sentence processing: Evidence against frequency-based accounts. In: Journal of Memory and Language, H. 43, S. 447–475. | en_GB |
| dc.references | Rayner K., Carlson M., Frazier L.(1983), The interaction of syntax and semantics during sentence processing: eye movements in the analysis of semantically biased sentences. In: Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, Bd. 22, H. 3, S. 358–374. | en_GB |
| dc.references | Schwenk H.-J.(2017a), Ergänzungen und Angaben und sonst nichts? Die syntaktische Umgebung des deutschen Verbs und ihre Gliederung, Frankfurt a.M.u.a. | en_GB |
| dc.references | Schwenk H.-J. (2017b), Exemplarisches Valenz- und Konstruktionswörterbuch deutscher Verben. Die Differenzierung und Klassifizierung der Begleiter des deutschen Verbs und ihre lexikographische Umsetzung in neuer Konzeption, Frankfurt a.M.u.a. | en_GB |
| dc.references | Schütze C.T., Gibson E. (1999), Argumenthood and English prepositional phrase attachment.In: Journal of Memory and Language, H. 40, S. 409–431. | en_GB |
| dc.references | Trueswell J.C., Tanenhaus M.K.(1994), Toward a lexicalist framework for constraint-based syntactic ambiguity resolution. In: Clifton C. Jr./Frazier L./Rayner K. (Hgg.), Perspectives in sentence processing, Hillsdale, NJ, S. 155–179. | en_GB |
| dc.references | Trueswell J.C., Tanenhaus, M.K., Garnsey S.M.(1994), Semantic influences on parsing: Use of thematic role information in syntactic ambiguity resolution. In: Journal of Memory and Language, Bd. 33, H. 3, S. 285–318. | en_GB |
| dc.references | Trueswell J.C., Tanenhaus M.K., Kello, C.(1993), Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: Separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths. In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, H. 19, S. 528–553. | en_GB |
| dc.references | Vosse T., Kempen G.(2000), Syntactic structure assembly in human parsing: a computational model based on competitive inhibition and a lexicalist grammar. In: Cognition, Bd. 72, H. 2, S. 105–143.Yoo D.G. (2007), Syntax und Kontext: Satzverarbeitung in kopffinalen Sprachen, Dissertation, Universität Bielefeld. | en_GB |
| dc.contributor.authorEmail | jolanta.sekowska@poczta.umcs.lublin.pl | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.18778/1427-9665.13.02 | |
