Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPierzak, Damian
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-03T13:50:18Z
dc.date.available2018-04-03T13:50:18Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn1733-0319
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/24416
dc.description.abstractThe recent book by Agnieszka Dziuba will be appreciated by both the ancient historians and the classical scholars in Poland for, as a monograph of a Roman woman, it has no antecedent. The study concerns Clodia’s background (“Clodia in historiography”), her portrayal by Cicero in the speech In Defense of M. Caelius Rufus, and her depiction in Catullus’ poetry. In the latter case, the author had to assume that in some of the poems Lesbia can be identified with Clodia Metelli. Despite some minor misrepresentations and misprints, the book is a sound analysis of the literary texts featuring the eponymous character. In addition, it offers a lively picture of the role women played in the Roman aristocratic society.en_GB
dc.language.isoplpl_PL
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl_PL
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCollectanea Philologica; 20
dc.subjectClodia Metellien_GB
dc.subjectCiceroen_GB
dc.subjectCatullusen_GB
dc.subjectbiographyen_GB
dc.subjectinvectiveen_GB
dc.titleAgnieszka Dziuba, Klodia Metelli. Literacki portret patrycjuszki, Wydawnictwo KUL, Lublin 2016, ss. 320 [recenzja]pl_PL
dc.title.alternativeAgnieszka Dziuba, Clodia Metelli. A Literary Portrayal of a Patrician Woman, Lublin 2016, pp. 320 [Review]en_GB
dc.typeArticlepl_PL
dc.rights.holder© Copyright by Authors, Łódź 2017; © Copyright for this edition by Uniwersytet Łódzki, Łódź 2017pl_PL
dc.page.number[175]-184
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationDépartement Lettres et Arts, École Normale Supérieure de Lyon, 15 parvis René Descartes, BP 7000 69342 Lyon Cedex 07 (France), UMR 5317 – l’IHRIM – Institut d’Histoire des Représentations et des Idées dans les Modernités.
dc.identifier.eissn2353-0901
dc.referencesAlexander, M. C. (2002). The Case for the Prosecution in the Ciceronian Era. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.en_GB
dc.referencesAustin, R. G. (ed.) (1960). M. Tulli Ciceronis Pro M. Caelio oratio. Oxford: Oxford University Press.en_GB
dc.referencesBieżuńska-Małowist, I. (1993). Kobiety antyku. Talenty, ambicje, umiejętności. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.en_GB
dc.referencesHelm, R. (ed.) (1972). Apulei Platonici Madaurensis Pro se de magia liber (apologia). Leipzig: B.G. Teubner.en_GB
dc.referencesKoster, S. (1980). Die Invektive in der griechischen und römischen Literatur. Meisenheim am Glan: Anton Hain.en_GB
dc.referencesKroll, W. (ed.) (1960). C. Valerius Catullus. Stuttgart: B.G. Teubner.en_GB
dc.referencesKühner, R., Stegmann, C. (1962). Ausführliche Grammatik der lateinischen Sprache. Satzlehre, zweiter Teil. München: Max Hueber.en_GB
dc.referencesLewandowski, I. (2007). Historiografia rzymska. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Poznańskie.en_GB
dc.referencesMalcovati, H. (ed.) (1955). Oratorum Romanorum fragmenta liberae rei publicae. Torino: G.B. Paravia.en_GB
dc.referencesMünzer, F. (1909). Aus dem Leben des M. Caelius Rufus. „Hermes” 44. 135–142.en_GB
dc.referencesNovokhatko, A. A. (ed.) (2009). The Invectives of Sallust and Cicero. Berlin–New York: Walter de Gruyter.en_GB
dc.referencesPierzak, D. (2015a). A Reading of Greek Myth in Cicero’s Speeches. The Case of Medea. W: M. Budzowska, J. Czerwińska (eds.). Ancient Myths in the Making of Culture. Frankfurt a. M.: Peter Lang.en_GB
dc.referencesPierzak, D. (2015b). Mit grecki w Mowach Cycerona. Diss. Katowice.en_GB
dc.referencesRadermacher, L. (ed.) (1965). M. Fabi Quintiliani Institutionis oratoriae libri XII. Lipsiae: B.G. Teubner.en_GB
dc.referencesSchmitz, D. (1985). Zeugen des Prozeßgegners in Gerichtsreden Ciceros. Frankfurt a. M.–Bern–New York: Peter Lang.en_GB
dc.referencesSkinner, M. B. (2011). Clodia Metelli. The Tribune’s Sister. Oxford–New York: Oxford University Press.en_GB
dc.referencesStegmann de Pritzwald, C. (ed.) (1965). C. Vellei Paterculi ex Historiae Romanae libris duobus quae supersunt. Stutgardiae: B.G. Teubner.en_GB
dc.referencesStroh, W. (1975). Taxis und Taktik: die advokatische Dispositionskunst in Ciceros Gerichtsreden. Stuttgart: B.G. Teubner.en_GB
dc.referencesSyndikus, H. P. (1984). Catull. Eine Interpretation. Erster Teil: Einleitung, Die kleine Gedichte (1–60). Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.en_GB
dc.referencesSyndikus, H. P. (1987). Catull. Eine Interpretation. Dritter Teil: Die Epigramme (69–116). Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.en_GB
dc.referencesSyndikus H. P. (1990). Catull. Eine Interpretation. Zweiter Teil: Die Grossen Gedichte (61–68). Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.en_GB
dc.referencesVolpe, M. (1977). The Persuasive Force of Humor: Cicero’s Defense of Caelius. „Quarterly Journal of Speech”. 63. 311–323.en_GB
dc.referencesvon Albrecht, M. (2012). Geschichte der römischen Literatur. Berlin–Boston: De Gruyter.en_GB
dc.referencesWilkins, A. S. (ed.) (1970). M. Tulli Ciceronis Rhetorica. T. II. Oxford: Oxford University Press.en_GB
dc.referencesWiseman, T. P. (1979). Clio’s Cosmetics. Three Studies in Greco–Roman Literature. Leicester: Leicester University Press, (przedruk: Bristol: Bristol Phoenix Press 2003).en_GB
dc.contributor.authorEmaildobryjanusz@interia.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1733-0319.20.13


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record