International Refugee Law and Judicial Dialogue from the Polish Perspective

Kowalski, Michał

dc.contributor.author	Kowalski, Michał
dc.contributor.editor	Wyrozumska, Anna
dc.date.accessioned	2018-03-20T09:31:11Z
dc.date.available	2018-03-20T09:31:11Z
dc.date.issued	2017
dc.identifier.citation	Kowalski M., International Refugee Law and Judicial Dialogue from the Polish Perspective, [in:] Wyrozumska A., (eds.), Transnational Judicial Dialogue on International Law in Central and Eastern Europe, Łódź University Press, Łódź 2017, p. [365]-397, doi: 10.18778/8088-707-7.08	pl_PL
dc.identifier.isbn	978-83-8088-707-7
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/11089/24243
dc.description.sponsorship	The monograph is a result of the project nr 10-ECRP-028 International Law through the National Prism: the Impact of Judicial Dialogue The research is based on laws being in force on 2nd August 2016	pl_PL
dc.language.iso	en	pl_PL
dc.publisher	Łódź University Press	pl_PL
dc.relation.ispartof	Wyrozumska A., (eds.), Transnational Judicial Dialogue on International Law in Central and Eastern Europe, Łódź University Press, Łódź 2017;
dc.rights	Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska	*
dc.rights.uri	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/pl/	*
dc.title	International Refugee Law and Judicial Dialogue from the Polish Perspective	pl_PL
dc.type	Book chapter	pl_PL
dc.rights.holder	© Copyright by Authors, Łódź 2017; © Copyright for this edition by Uniwersytet Łódzki, Łódź 2017	pl_PL
dc.page.number	[365]-397	pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliation	Faculty of Law and Administration, Jagiellonian University in Cracow, Poland.	pl_PL
dc.identifier.eisbn	978-83-8088-708-4
dc.references	Chahal v the UK, App. no. 22414/93 (15 November 1996) [ECtHR]	pl_PL
dc.references	D. v the UK, App. no. 30240/96 (2 May 1997) [ECtHR]	pl_PL
dc.references	Soering v the UK, App. no. 14038/88 (7 July 1989) [ECtHR]	pl_PL
dc.references	F. v the UK, App. no. 17341/03 (inadmissibility decision, 22 June 2004) [ECtHR]	pl_PL
dc.references	I.I.N. v the Netherlands, App. no. 2035/04 (inadmissibility decision, 9 December 2004) [ECtHR]	pl_PL
dc.references	Salah Sheekh v the Netherlands, App. no. 1948/04 (11 January 2007) [ECtHR]	pl_PL
dc.references	N. v the UK, App. no. 26565/05 (27 May 2008) [ECtHR]	pl_PL
dc.references	T.I. v the UK, App. no. 43844/98 (inadmissibility decision, 7 March 2000) [ECtHR]	pl_PL
dc.references	Yoh-Ekale Mwanje v Belgium, App. no. 10486/10 (20 December 2011) [ECtHR]	pl_PL
dc.references	Tarakhel v Switzerland, App. no. 29217/12 (4 November 2012) [ECtHR]	pl_PL
dc.references	Mamilov v Poland, App. no. 18358/07 (inadmissibility decision/striking out of the list of cases, 20 October 2010) [ECtHR]	pl_PL
dc.references	Sufi and Elmi v the UK, App. nos 8319/07 and 11449/07 (28 June 2011) [ECtHR]	pl_PL
dc.references	M.S.S. v Belgium and Greece, App. no. 30696/09 (21 January 2012) [ECtHR]	pl_PL
dc.references	K.A.B. v Sweden, App. no. 886/11 (5 September 2013) [ECtHR]	pl_PL
dc.references	S.J. v Belgium, App. no. 70055/10 (Chamber, 27 February 2014) [ECtHR]	pl_PL
dc.references	M.E. v Sweden, App. no. 713398/12 (Chamber, 26 June 2014) [ECtHR]	pl_PL
dc.references	S.J. v Belgium, App. no. 70055/10 (Grand Chamber, 15 March 2015) [ECtHR]	pl_PL
dc.references	M.E. v Sweden, App. no. 713398/12 (Grand Chamber, 8 April 2015) [ECtHR]	pl_PL
dc.references	R.H. v Sweden, App. no. 4601/14 (10 September 2015) [ECtHR]	pl_PL
dc.references	C-465/07 Meki Elgafaji, Noor Elgafaji v Staatssecretaris van Justitie (17 February 2009) [CJEU]	pl_PL
dc.references	C‑199/12–C‑201/127, X, Y and Z v Minister voor Immigratie en Asiel (7 November 2013) [CJEU]	pl_PL
dc.references	C‑148/13–C‑150/13, A, B, C v Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie (2 December 2014) [CJEU]	pl_PL
dc.references	C-542/13 Mohamed M’Bodj v État belge (18 December 2014) [CJEU]	pl_PL
dc.references	C-562/13 Centre public d’action sociale d’Ottignies-Louvain-la-Neuve v Moussa Abdida (18 December 2014) [CJEU]	pl_PL
dc.references	C‑472/13 Andre Lawrence Shepherd v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (26 February 2015) [CJEU]	pl_PL
dc.references	V SA 1494/02 (29 January 2003) [Supreme Administrative Court]	pl_PL
dc.references	II OSK 237/07 (8 May 2008) [Supreme Administrative Court]	pl_PL
dc.references	V SA/Wa 874/10 (4 December 2009) [Warsaw Administrative Court]	pl_PL
dc.references	IV SA/Wa 1387/13 (15 October 2013) [Warsaw Administrative Court]	pl_PL
dc.references	IV SA/Wa 1557/14 (29 October 2014) [Warsaw Administrative Court]	pl_PL
dc.references	IV SA/Wa 2152/14 (22 January 2015) [Warsaw Administrative Court]	pl_PL
dc.references	IV SA/Wa 681/15 (22 September 2015) [Warsaw Administrative Court]	pl_PL
dc.references	IV SA/Wa 694/15 (24 September 2015) [Warsaw Administrative Court]	pl_PL
dc.references	RdU-129-4/S/07 (3 April 2009) [Refugee Board]	pl_PL
dc.references	RdU-908-1/S/09 (23 October 2009) [Refugee Board]	pl_PL
dc.references	RdU-1182-1/S/09 (14 January 2010) [Refugee Board]	pl_PL
dc.references	RdU-161-1/S/12 (28 May 2012) [Refugee Board]	pl_PL
dc.references	RdU-178-1/S/12 (25 July 2012) [Refugee Board]	pl_PL
dc.references	RdU-246-1/S/13 (29 August 2013) [Refugee Board]	pl_PL
dc.references	RdU-72-5/S/08 (14 October 2013) [Refugee Board]	pl_PL
dc.references	RdU-93-1/S/14 (29 May 2014) [Refugee Board]	pl_PL
dc.references	RdU-560-2/S/15 (4 December 2015) [Refugee Board]	pl_PL
dc.references	RdU-588-2/S/15 (17 March 2016) [Refugee Board]	pl_PL
dc.references	RdU-1109-1/S/15 (7 April 2016) [Refugee Board]	pl_PL
dc.references	RdU-956-1/S/15 (22 April 2016) [Refugee Board]	pl_PL
dc.references	RdU-550-3/S/14 (22 April 2016) [Refugee Board]	pl_PL
dc.references	RdU-705-2/S/15 (27 April 2016) [Refugee Board]	pl_PL
dc.references	Islam v Secretary of State for the Home department; R. V. Immigration Appeal Tribunal, ex p. Shah (1999) 2 AC 629 (HL)	pl_PL
dc.references	The UK Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Omoruyi v Secretary of State for the Home Department, (2001) Imm AR 175	pl_PL
dc.references	Aguirre Cervantes v INS of 21 March 2001 accessed via (2001) 13 International Journal of Refugee Law 586	pl_PL
dc.references	E. M. v Ministry of Interior 4 Azs 99/2007-93 (Supreme Administrative Court of the Czech Republic – Nejvyšší správní soud, 24 January 2008)	pl_PL
dc.references	Refugee Appeal No. 76456 (New Zealand: Refugee Status Appeals Authority, 15 March 2010)	pl_PL
dc.references	HJ (Iran) and HT (Cameroon) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, UKSC 31 (7 July 2010)	pl_PL
dc.references	Joly D., Heaven or Hell?: Asylum Policies and Refugees in Europe (Macmillan Press 1996)	pl_PL
dc.references	Goodwin-Gill G.S., McAdam J., The Refugee in International Law (3rd ed., Oxford University Press 2007)	pl_PL
dc.references	Kowalski M., ‘Sexuelle Orientierung im Flüchtlingsrecht und im allgemeinen Migrationsrecht Polens unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Verifizierungsproblematik im Verfahren’, [in:] Classen C.D., Richter D., Łukańko B. (eds), ‘Sexuelle Orientierung’ als Diskriminierungsgrund. Regelungsbedarf in Deutschland und Polen? (Mohr Siebeck 2016) 316	pl_PL
dc.references	Kowalski M., ‘Konflikt na Ukrainie a praktyka udzielania ochrony cudzoziemcom na terytorium Rzeczpospolitej Polskiej’ [Ukrainian Conflict and the Practice of Granting Protection to Foreigners on the Territory of the Republic of Poland], [in:] Pudzianowska D. (ed.), Status cudzoziemca w Polsce w świetle współczesnych wyzwań międzynarodowych [The Foreigner’s Status in Poland in Light of the Contemporary International Challenges] (Wolters Kluwer 2016) 96	pl_PL
dc.references	Tzanakopoulos A., ‘Judicial Dialogue as Means of Interpretation’, [in:] Aust H., Nolte G. (eds), The Interpretation of International Law by Domestic Courts: Uniformity, Diversity, Convergence (Oxford University Press 2016) 72	pl_PL
dc.references	Einarsen T., ‘The European Convention on Human Rights and the Notion of an Implied Right to de facto Asylum’ (1990) 2 International Journal of Refugee Law 361	pl_PL
dc.references	Benvenisti E., ‘Reclaiming Democracy: The Strategic Uses of Foreign and International Law by National Courts’ (2008) 102 American Journal of International Law 241	pl_PL
dc.references	Lambert H., ‘Transnational Judicial Dialogue, Harmonization and the Common European Asylum System’ (2009) 58 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 519	pl_PL
dc.references	Weßels J., ‘HJ (Iran) and HT (Cameroon) – Reflections on a new test for sexuality-based asylum claims in Britain’ (2012) 24 International Journal of Refugee Law 815	pl_PL
dc.references	Frishman O., ‘Transnational Judicial Dialogue as an Organisation Field’ (2013) 19 European Law Journal 739	pl_PL
dc.references	Bank R., ‘The Potential and Limitations of the Court of Justice of the European Union in Shaping International Refugee Law’ (2015) 27 International Journal of Refugee Law 213	pl_PL
dc.references	Aldenhoff L., Clayton G., McDonough P., Actors of Protection and the Application of the Internal Protection Alternative. European Comparative Report (European Council on Refugees and Exiles 2014)	pl_PL
dc.references	Cafaggi F. et al., Judicial Interactions Techniques – Their Potential and Use in European Fundamental Rights Adjudication (European University Institute 2014)	pl_PL
dc.references	Peers S., ‘Could EU law save Paddington Bear? The CJEU develops a new type of protection’ (EU Law Analysis, 21 December 2014), <http://eulawanalysis.blogspot.co.uk> (access: 30 April 2016)	pl_PL
dc.references	UNHCR, Guidelines on International Protection No 4: “Internal Flight or Relocation Alternative” within the Context of Article 1A(2) of the 1951 Convention and/or 1967 Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees, HCR/GIP/03/04, 23 July 2003	pl_PL
dc.references	UNHCR, Handbook on Procedures and Criteria for Determining Refugee Status under the 1951 Convention and the 1967 Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees (Geneva 1992, reedited)	pl_PL
dc.identifier.doi	10.18778/8088-707-7.08