dc.contributor.author | Sztabiński, Grzegorz | |
dc.contributor.editor | Pawłowska, Aneta | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-09-28T11:03:59Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-09-28T11:03:59Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Sztabiński G., Empatia w sztuce – dawniej i dziś, [w:] Pawłowska A., Jedlińska E., Stefański K., (red.), Acta Artis. Studia ofiarowane Profesor Wandzie Nowakowskiej, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź 2016, s. [93]-115, doi: 10.18778/8088-239-3.08 | pl_PL |
dc.identifier.isbn | 978-83-8088-239-3 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11089/22747 | |
dc.description.abstract | At the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries, scholars began to include the notion of empathy
in their reflections on art; such a perspective was aimed at revaluing basic aesthetic issues.
The article summarizes the core principles of the concept of empathy employed in the field
of fine arts, and examines its use in the theories of such scholars as Robert Vischer, Theodor
Lipps, Heinrich Wölfflin and Wilhelm Worringer. This will be followed by a brief consideration
of the reasons why this idea was rejected by the researchers on art in the second half
of the 20th century. Against this background, my article will pose the question regarding
a return to the concept of empathy in the reflection on the visual arts in this century. Its
symptoms have been pointed out by some Anglophone authors (such as Juliet Koss). One
should, however, note the differences in the new approach. The former biophysiological
background has been replaced with references to contemporary research on brain functioning.
Instead of concentrating on the expressive character of architecture, scholars explore
e.g. an empathetic response to human images (David Freedberg) or to landscapes and still
lifes (Michael Fried). | pl_PL |
dc.description.sponsorship | Publikacja dofinansowana przez Fundację Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego oraz Katedrę Historii Sztuki | pl_PL |
dc.language.iso | pl | pl_PL |
dc.publisher | Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego | pl_PL |
dc.relation.ispartof | Pawłowska A., Jedlińska E., Stefański K., (red.), Acta Artis. Studia ofiarowane Profesor Wandzie Nowakowskiej, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź 2016; | |
dc.rights | Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Na tych samych warunkach 3.0 Polska | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/pl/ | * |
dc.subject | empatia | pl_PL |
dc.subject | sztuka | pl_PL |
dc.title | Empatia w sztuce – dawniej i dziś | pl_PL |
dc.title.alternative | Empathy in art: past and present | pl_PL |
dc.type | Book chapter | pl_PL |
dc.rights.holder | © Copyright by Authors, Łódź 2016, © Copyright for this edition by Uniwersytet Łódzki, Łódź 2016 | pl_PL |
dc.page.number | [93]-115 | pl_PL |
dc.contributor.authorAffiliation | Uniwersytet Łódzki, Katedra Historii Sztuki | pl_PL |
dc.identifier.eisbn | 978-83-8088-240-9 | |
dc.references | Architecture as Performing Art, red. M. Feuerstein, G. Read, Burlington 2013. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Arnheim R., Sztuka i percepcja wzrokowa. Psychologia twórczego oka, tłum. J. Mach, Warszawa 1978. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Bachmann-Medick D., Cultural Turns. Nowe kierunki w naukach o kulturze, tłum. K. Krzemieniowa, Warszawa 2012. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Bayer R., Histoire de l’esthétique, Paris 1961. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Bridge H., Empathy theory and Heinrich Wölfflin: A reconsideration, „Journal of European Studies” 2010, t. 41, nr 1, s. 3–22. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Colman A.M., Słownik psychologii, Warszawa 2009. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Esrock E.J., Embodying Art: The Spectator and the Inner Body, „Poetics Today” 2010, t. 31, nr 2, s. 217–250. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Freedberg D., Potęga wizerunków. S tudia z h istorii i t eorii o ddziaływania, tłum. E. Klekot, Kraków 2005. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Freedberg D., Gallese V., Motion, emotion and empathy in esthetic experience, „Trends in Cognitive Sciences” 2007, t. 11, nr 5, s. 197–202. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Fried M., Menzel’s Realism: Art and Embodiment in Nineteenth-Century Berlin, New Haven 2002. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Koss J., On the Limits of Empathy, „The Art Bulletin” 2006, t. 88, nr 1, s. 139–157. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Lipps Th., Ästhetik: Psychologie des Schönen und der Kunst, t. 1: Grundlegung der Ästhetik, Hamburg–Leipzig 1903. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Morawski S., Ekspresja, „Studia Estetyczne” 1974, nr 11, s. 315–335. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, red. E.N. Zalta, Stanford 2015, http://plato.stanford. edu/ (dostęp: 18.01.2016). | pl_PL |
dc.references | Sztabiński G., Dlaczego geometria? Problemy współczesnej sztuki geometrycznej, Łódź 2004. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Vischer R., On the Optical Sense of Form: A Contribution to Aesthetics, [w:] Empathy, Form, and Space: Problems in German Aesthetics, 1873–1893, Santa Monica 1994. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Vocabulaire d’esthétique, red. A. Souriau, Paris 1990. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Wölfflin H., Prolegomena to a Psychology of Architecture, [w:] Art in Theory, 1815–1900. An Anthology of Changing Ideas, red. Ch. Harrison, P. Wood, J. Gaiger, Malden–Oxford–Carlton 1998, s. 711–717. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Wölfflin H., Renaissance et Baroque, tłum. G. Ballangé, Paris 1967. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Worringer W., Abstraction et Einfühlung. Contribution à la psychologie du style, tłum. E. Martineau, Paris 1978. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Worringer W., L’art gothique, tłum. D. Decourdemanche, Paris 1967. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Ramachandran V.S., Neuronauka o podstawach człowieczeństwa. O czym mówi mózg?, tłum. A i M. Binderowie, E. Józefowicz, Warszawa 2012. | pl_PL |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.18778/8088-239-3.08 | |