dc.contributor.author | Flynn, Susan | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-05-16T10:31:52Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-05-16T10:31:52Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2353-6098 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11089/21630 | |
dc.description.abstract | Contemporary Hollywood film narrates the fear of monstrous science; attending to the
modulations of medicine, capital and the body. The filmic body is employed to illustrate the
power of the new biotechnologies to create and sustain life and the new sets of social relations
which are a consequence of the marriage of capital and medicine. In the Hollywood film,
persons who do not fit the ideal healthy persona have a moral duty to pursue repair and
transformation. Constructed as inherently lacking, the unhealthy body becomes a repository
for social anxieties about control and vulnerability, vis-à-vis the enormous and exponentially
expanding science and technology fields. Hierarchies of embodiment are played out on the Big
Screen as imperfect bodies are excluded from public life, power and status and urged to strive
for “optimization”. Late modern societies present the possibility of new technologies which
have the potential to radicalize bodies. However, these potential modulations are ultimately
derived from a set of ideologies around the body and the power of the individual to enact an
individualized solution. Contemporary narratives circulate around ownership of capital and
the price of “repair.” This marriage of science and capital in popular narratives may be
indicative of concerns for our future, as the power to make and repair life seems to rest
increasingly in the hands of an elite. | pl_PL |
dc.language.iso | en | pl_PL |
dc.publisher | Department of Studies in Drama and Pre-1800 English Literature, University of Łódź | pl_PL |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Analyses/Rereadings/Theories Journal;1 | |
dc.rights | Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/pl/ | * |
dc.subject | Science fiction | pl_PL |
dc.subject | Foucault | pl_PL |
dc.subject | biopower | pl_PL |
dc.subject | biotechnology | pl_PL |
dc.subject | ideology | pl_PL |
dc.title | Ambiguous Bodies, Biopower and the Ideologies of Science Fiction | pl_PL |
dc.type | Article | pl_PL |
dc.rights.holder | Susan Flynn | pl_PL |
dc.page.number | 25-33 | pl_PL |
dc.contributor.authorAffiliation | University of the Arts, London | pl_PL |
dc.contributor.authorBiographicalnote | Dr. Susan Flynn lectures in media and cultural studies at the University of the Arts, London,
specialising in disability, diversity, film and equality studies. She is co-editor of the upcoming
collection Spaces of Surveillance: States and Selves, (2017) Palgrave. Upcoming special editor
roles include American, British and Canadian Studies and The Apollonian. Recent publications
include a chapter in Fraser, B. (ed) (2016) Cultures of Representation: Disability in World Film
Contexts and a range of international journals such as Considering Disability, The International
Scientific Journal and Spark Journal. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Braidotti, Rosie. The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity, 2013. Print. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Davis, Leonard. “The End of Identity Politics and the Beginning of Dismodernism: On Disability as an Unstable Category.” Disability Studies Reader. New York: Routledge, 2006. 231-42. Print. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Easthope, Anthony. Contemporary Film Theory. London: Longman, 1993. Print. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Flynn, Susan. “Equality, Culture and Representation: Considerations on the Film Industry.” Considering Disability 1 (2015): 15-26. Print. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Flynn, Susan. “‘Get Your Legs Back’: Avatar (2009) and the Re-booting of American Individualism.” Cultures of Representation: Disability in World Cinema Contexts. Ed. Benjamin Fraser. New York: Wallflower Press, 2016. 200-15. Print. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Flynn, Susan. “New Poetics of the Film Body: Docility, Molecular Fundamentalism and Twenty First Century Destiny.” American, British and Canadian Studies 24:1 (2015): 5-23. Print. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Foucault, Michel. The Birth of the Clinic: An Archaeology of Medical Perception. Trans. A.M. Sheridan. London: Routledge, 1973. Print. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Garland-Thomson, Rosemarie. Extraordinary Bodies: Figuring Disability in American Culture and Literature. New York: Columbia UP, 1997. Print. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Greene, Todd William. “Three Ideologies of Individualism: Toward Assimilating a Theory of Individualisms and their Consequences.” Critical Sociology 32.1 (2008): 117-37. Print. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Haraway, Donna. “A Manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, Technology, and Social Feminism in the 1980s.” Socialist Review 80 (1989): 65-107. Print. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Hughes, Bill, and Kevin Patterson. “The Social Model of Disability and the Disappearing Body: Towards a Sociology of Impairment.” Disability & Society 12 (1997): 325-40. Print. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Mitchell, David T., and Sharon L. Snyder. Cultural Locations of Disability. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2006. Print. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Marx, Karl and Friedrich Engels. The Marx-Engels Reader. 2nd ed. Ed. Tucker, R. C. New York: Norton, 1978. Print. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Mitchell, David T., and Sharon L. Snyder. Cultural Locations of Disability. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2006. Print. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Oliver, Mike. The Politics of Disablement. London: Macmillan, 1990. Print. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Reeve, Donna. “Cyborgs, Cripples and iCrip: Reflections on the Contributions of Haraway to Disability Studies.” Disability and Social Theory: New Developments and Directions. Ed. Dan Goodley, Bill Hughes, and Lennard Davis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012. 91-111. Print. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Rose, Nicolas. The Politics of Life Itself. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2007. Print. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Shapiro, Steven. The Cinematic Body. Minnesota: U of Minnesota P, 1993. Print. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Springer, Claudia. “The Pleasure of the Interface.” Screen 32.3 (1991): 303-23. Print. | pl_PL |
dc.references | White, Julie A., and Joan Tronto. “Political Practices of Care: Needs and Rights.” Ratio Juris 14.4 (2004): 425-53. Print. | pl_PL |
dc.relation.volume | 4 | pl_PL |