Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFlynn, Susan
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-16T10:31:52Z
dc.date.available2017-05-16T10:31:52Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.issn2353-6098
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/21630
dc.description.abstractContemporary Hollywood film narrates the fear of monstrous science; attending to the modulations of medicine, capital and the body. The filmic body is employed to illustrate the power of the new biotechnologies to create and sustain life and the new sets of social relations which are a consequence of the marriage of capital and medicine. In the Hollywood film, persons who do not fit the ideal healthy persona have a moral duty to pursue repair and transformation. Constructed as inherently lacking, the unhealthy body becomes a repository for social anxieties about control and vulnerability, vis-à-vis the enormous and exponentially expanding science and technology fields. Hierarchies of embodiment are played out on the Big Screen as imperfect bodies are excluded from public life, power and status and urged to strive for “optimization”. Late modern societies present the possibility of new technologies which have the potential to radicalize bodies. However, these potential modulations are ultimately derived from a set of ideologies around the body and the power of the individual to enact an individualized solution. Contemporary narratives circulate around ownership of capital and the price of “repair.” This marriage of science and capital in popular narratives may be indicative of concerns for our future, as the power to make and repair life seems to rest increasingly in the hands of an elite.pl_PL
dc.language.isoenpl_PL
dc.publisherDepartment of Studies in Drama and Pre-1800 English Literature, University of Łódźpl_PL
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAnalyses/Rereadings/Theories Journal;1
dc.rightsUznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/pl/*
dc.subjectScience fictionpl_PL
dc.subjectFoucaultpl_PL
dc.subjectbiopowerpl_PL
dc.subjectbiotechnologypl_PL
dc.subjectideologypl_PL
dc.titleAmbiguous Bodies, Biopower and the Ideologies of Science Fictionpl_PL
dc.typeArticlepl_PL
dc.rights.holderSusan Flynnpl_PL
dc.page.number25-33pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniversity of the Arts, Londonpl_PL
dc.contributor.authorBiographicalnoteDr. Susan Flynn lectures in media and cultural studies at the University of the Arts, London, specialising in disability, diversity, film and equality studies. She is co-editor of the upcoming collection Spaces of Surveillance: States and Selves, (2017) Palgrave. Upcoming special editor roles include American, British and Canadian Studies and The Apollonian. Recent publications include a chapter in Fraser, B. (ed) (2016) Cultures of Representation: Disability in World Film Contexts and a range of international journals such as Considering Disability, The International Scientific Journal and Spark Journal.pl_PL
dc.referencesBraidotti, Rosie. The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity, 2013. Print.pl_PL
dc.referencesDavis, Leonard. “The End of Identity Politics and the Beginning of Dismodernism: On Disability as an Unstable Category.” Disability Studies Reader. New York: Routledge, 2006. 231-42. Print.pl_PL
dc.referencesEasthope, Anthony. Contemporary Film Theory. London: Longman, 1993. Print.pl_PL
dc.referencesFlynn, Susan. “Equality, Culture and Representation: Considerations on the Film Industry.” Considering Disability 1 (2015): 15-26. Print.pl_PL
dc.referencesFlynn, Susan. “‘Get Your Legs Back’: Avatar (2009) and the Re-booting of American Individualism.” Cultures of Representation: Disability in World Cinema Contexts. Ed. Benjamin Fraser. New York: Wallflower Press, 2016. 200-15. Print.pl_PL
dc.referencesFlynn, Susan. “New Poetics of the Film Body: Docility, Molecular Fundamentalism and Twenty First Century Destiny.” American, British and Canadian Studies 24:1 (2015): 5-23. Print.pl_PL
dc.referencesFoucault, Michel. The Birth of the Clinic: An Archaeology of Medical Perception. Trans. A.M. Sheridan. London: Routledge, 1973. Print.pl_PL
dc.referencesGarland-Thomson, Rosemarie. Extraordinary Bodies: Figuring Disability in American Culture and Literature. New York: Columbia UP, 1997. Print.pl_PL
dc.referencesGreene, Todd William. “Three Ideologies of Individualism: Toward Assimilating a Theory of Individualisms and their Consequences.” Critical Sociology 32.1 (2008): 117-37. Print.pl_PL
dc.referencesHaraway, Donna. “A Manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, Technology, and Social Feminism in the 1980s.” Socialist Review 80 (1989): 65-107. Print.pl_PL
dc.referencesHughes, Bill, and Kevin Patterson. “The Social Model of Disability and the Disappearing Body: Towards a Sociology of Impairment.” Disability & Society 12 (1997): 325-40. Print.pl_PL
dc.referencesMitchell, David T., and Sharon L. Snyder. Cultural Locations of Disability. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2006. Print.pl_PL
dc.referencesMarx, Karl and Friedrich Engels. The Marx-Engels Reader. 2nd ed. Ed. Tucker, R. C. New York: Norton, 1978. Print.pl_PL
dc.referencesMitchell, David T., and Sharon L. Snyder. Cultural Locations of Disability. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2006. Print.pl_PL
dc.referencesOliver, Mike. The Politics of Disablement. London: Macmillan, 1990. Print.pl_PL
dc.referencesReeve, Donna. “Cyborgs, Cripples and iCrip: Reflections on the Contributions of Haraway to Disability Studies.” Disability and Social Theory: New Developments and Directions. Ed. Dan Goodley, Bill Hughes, and Lennard Davis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012. 91-111. Print.pl_PL
dc.referencesRose, Nicolas. The Politics of Life Itself. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2007. Print.pl_PL
dc.referencesShapiro, Steven. The Cinematic Body. Minnesota: U of Minnesota P, 1993. Print.pl_PL
dc.referencesSpringer, Claudia. “The Pleasure of the Interface.” Screen 32.3 (1991): 303-23. Print.pl_PL
dc.referencesWhite, Julie A., and Joan Tronto. “Political Practices of Care: Needs and Rights.” Ratio Juris 14.4 (2004): 425-53. Print.pl_PL
dc.relation.volume4pl_PL


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska