dc.contributor.author | Pillai, Swarnavel Eswaran | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-05-15T06:30:53Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-05-15T06:30:53Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2353-6098 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11089/21541 | |
dc.description.abstract | The recurrent theme of dropping frontiers in a world which has become increasingly
heterogeneous but intolerant is the leitmotif of Sashi Tharoor’s Riot and Salman Rushdie’s The
Moor’s Last Sigh. The figure of the Moor and his hybrid genealogy is central to Rushdie’s
vision, as he reconstructs a syncretic, tolerant Moorish Spain and juxtaposes it with Bombay,
his haven of pluralism. He celebrates Nehru’s vision of a new Indian nation which, in keeping
with the traditions of western modernity, promised to be above religion, clan, and narrow
parochial considerations.
With the vanishing of such ideals and hopes, as boundaries and religious communalism are
getting intensified these diasporic cosmopolitan writers make a case for a boundless world.
Their response is a human subjectivity which transcends color, class, narrow parochialism,
tribalism and fundamentalism. Secularism is the very base of their humane approach. This
essay, therefore, analyzes the theme of secularism and its discontents, particularly in the
context of the coexistence of Hindus and Muslims in India, as it runs through Rushdie’s The
Moor’s Last Sigh and Tharoor’s Riot by exploring the various layers of allegories related to
pluralism and the critique of fundamentalism in them. Toward this end, it will focus on the
recent debates on Indian secularism by scholars to interrogate the relevance of the European
model of secularism which argues for the separation of state and religion. | pl_PL |
dc.language.iso | en | pl_PL |
dc.publisher | Department of Studies in Drama and Pre-1800 English Literature, University of Łódź | pl_PL |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Analyses/Rereadings/Theories Jornal;1 | |
dc.rights | Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/pl/ | * |
dc.subject | Secularism | pl_PL |
dc.subject | Salman Rushdie | pl_PL |
dc.subject | The Moor’s Last Sigh | pl_PL |
dc.subject | Sashi Tharoor | pl_PL |
dc.subject | State and Religion | pl_PL |
dc.title | Secularism and Its Discontents: The Moor’s Last Sigh and Riot | pl_PL |
dc.type | Article | pl_PL |
dc.rights.holder | Swarnavel Eswaran Pillai | pl_PL |
dc.page.number | 1-14 | pl_PL |
dc.contributor.authorAffiliation | Michigan State University | pl_PL |
dc.contributor.authorBiographicalnote | Dr. Swarnavel Eswaran Pillai is an associate professor in the English, and Media and
Information Departments at Michigan State University. He is a graduate from the Film and
Television Institute of India and the University of Iowa. He is an accomplished filmmaker, and
his recent documentaries include Migrations of Islam (2014) and Hmong Memory at the
Crossroads (2015). His research focuses on the history, theory, and production of documentaries,
and the specificity of Tamil cinema, and its complex relationship with Hollywood as well as
popular Hindi films. His recent books are Cinema: Sattagamum Saalaramum (Nizhal, 2013), an
anthology of essays on documentaries and experimental films in Tamil and Madras Studios:
Narrative, Genre, and Ideology in Tamil Cinema (Sage Publications, 2015). | pl_PL |
dc.references | Bilgrami, Akeel. ―Secularism, Nationalism and Modernity.‖ Secularism and Its Critics. Ed. Rajeev Bhargava. New Delhi: Oxford U P, 2005. 380-417. Print. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Chatterjee, Partha. ―Secularism and Toleration (1994).‖ Empire and Nation: Selected Essays. New York: Columbia U P, 2010. 203-35. Print. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Cossman, Brenda, and Ratna Kapur. Secularism’s Last Sigh: Hindutva and the (Mis)Rule of Law. New Delhi: Oxford U P, 1999. Print. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Deshmukh, K.G. ―Common Affinities.‖ Secularism in India – A Challenge. Ed. Radhey Mohan. New Delhi: Dr. Zakir Husain Educational & Cultural Foundation, 1990. 65-74. Print. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Madan, T.N. ―Secularism in Its Place‖ Secularism and Its Critics. Ed. Rajeev Bhargava. New Delhi: Oxford U P, 1998. 297-321. Print. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Nandy, Ashis. ―The Politics of Secularism and the Recovery of Religious Toleration.‖ Secularism and Its Critics. Ed. Rajeev Bhargava New Delhi: Oxford U P, 1998. 321-45. Print. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Rushdie, Salman. Step Across This Line. New York: Random House, 2002. Print. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Rushdie, Salman. The Moor’s Last Sigh. New York: Vintage, 1997. Print. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Sen, Amartya. ―Secularism and Its Discontents.‖ Secularism and Its Critics. Ed. Rajeev Bhargava. New Delhi: Oxford U P, 1998. 454-86. Print. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Sunder Rajan, Rajeswari. ―Women Between Community and State: Some Implications of the Uniform Civil Code Debates In India.‖ The Scandal of the State: Women, Law and Citizenship in Postcolonial India. Durham: Duke U P, 2003. 147-73. Print. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Tharoor, Shashi. Riot. New York: Arcade, 2001. Print. | pl_PL |
dc.relation.volume | 4 | pl_PL |