Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMarkowska-Przybyła, Urszula
dc.contributor.authorRamsey, David Mark
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-05T12:01:31Z
dc.date.available2017-04-05T12:01:31Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.issn0208-6018
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/21205
dc.description.abstractNorms of reciprocity and the level of generalised trust are components of the social capital of a society, which is argued to be associated with economic growth. This article presents results from a large scale study of Polish students based on the Trust Game, in which an initiator and respondent can obtain mutual benefits when the initiator exhibits trust in the respondent, who then expresses positive reciprocity. Based on these results, we investigate norms of positive reciprocation within the Polish student community. Analysis indicates that a large proportion of students seem to use one of four simple norms of reciprocation. In statistical terms, the level of reciprocation is rather well reflected in the expectations of the initiators.en_GB
dc.description.abstractZaufanie uogólnione i normy odwzajemnienia są komponentami kapitału społecznego, które według wielu ekonomistów są powiązane ze wzrostem gospodarczym. Artykuł przedstawia wyniki zakrojonych na dużą skalę badań przeprowadzonych wśród polskich studentów, bazujących na grze „zaufanie”, w której inicjator i respondent mogą osiągnąć wzajemne korzyści, o ile inicjator zaufa respondentowi, a ten następnie to odwzajemni. Bazując na wynikach tych badań, autorzy analizują normy pozytywnego odwzajemnienia wśród zbiorowości polskich studentów. Analizy wskazują, że duży odsetek studentów zdaje się używać jednej z czterech prostych norm odwzajemnienia. W ujęciu statystycznym, poziom odwzajemnienia jest raczej dobrze odzwierciedlony w oczekiwaniach inicjatorów.pl_PL
dc.description.sponsorshipThis project is funded by the National Science Centre of Poland on the basis of decision no. DEC-2012/07/B/HS5/03954en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegoen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesActa Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Oeconomica;323
dc.subjectsocial capitalen_GB
dc.subjectgeneralised trusten_GB
dc.subjectreciprocationen_GB
dc.subjectnormsen_GB
dc.subjectexperimental game theoryen_GB
dc.subjectthe Trust Gameen_GB
dc.subjectPolanden_GB
dc.subjectkapitał społecznypl_PL
dc.subjectzaufanie uogólnionepl_PL
dc.subjectnormapl_PL
dc.subjectodwzajemnieniepl_PL
dc.subjectgra eksperymentalnapl_PL
dc.subjectgra „zaufanie”pl_PL
dc.subjectPolskapl_PL
dc.titleNorms of Reciprocation Exhibited by Polish Students in the Trust Game: Experimental Resultsen_GB
dc.title.alternativeNormy odwzajemnienia ukazane przez polskich studentów w grze „zaufanie”: wyniki eksperymentalnepl_PL
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.rights.holder© Copyright by Uniwersytet Łódzki, Łódź 2016en_GB
dc.page.number[5]-20
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationWrocław University of Economics, Faculty of Economics, Management and Tourism, Department of Spatial Management
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationWrocław University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Computer Science and Management, Department of Operations Research
dc.identifier.eissn2353-7663
dc.referencesAkaike H. (1974), A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 19(6), p. 716–723.pl_PL
dc.referencesAlgan Y., Cahuc P. (2010), Inherited trust and growth, American Economic Review 100(5), p. 2060–2092.pl_PL
dc.referencesAshraf N., Bohnet I., Piankov N. (2006), Decomposing trust and trustworthiness, Experimental Economics 9(3), p. 193–208.pl_PL
dc.referencesBahry D.L., Whitt S., Wilson R.K. (2003), The wasted generation: intergenerational trust in Russia, Allied Social Science Meetings, Washington, DC.pl_PL
dc.referencesBaran N.M., Sapienza P., Zingales, L. (2010), Can we infer social preferences from the lab? Evidence from the trust game, No. w15654, National Bureau of Economic Research.pl_PL
dc.referencesBerg J., Dickhaut J., McCabe K. (1995), Trust, reciprocity and social history, Games and Economic Behavior 10(1), p. 122–142.pl_PL
dc.referencesBorghans L., Heckman J.J., Golsteyn B. H., Meijers H. (2009), Gender differences in risk aversion and ambiguity aversion, “Journal of the European Economic Association” 7(2–3), p. 649–658.pl_PL
dc.referencesCroson R., Buchan N. (1999), Gender and culture: International experimental evidence from trust games, “American Economic Review” 89(2), p. 386–391.pl_PL
dc.referencesCzapiński J. (2008), Kapitał ludzki i kapitał społeczny a dobrobyt materialny, Polski parodoks, „Zarządzanie Publiczne” 2(4), p. 5–28.pl_PL
dc.referencesDempster A.P., Laird N.M., Rubin D.B. (1977), Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm, “Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (methodological)” 39, p. 1–38.pl_PL
dc.referencesDunning D., Fetchenhauer D., Schlösser T.M. (2012), Trust as a social and emotional act: Noneconomic considerations in trust behaviour, “Journal of Economic Psychology” 33(3), p. 686–694.pl_PL
dc.referencesDziałek J. (2009), Social Capital and Economic Growth in Polish Regions, Munich Personal RePEc Archive, Paper No. 18287, http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/18287/1/MPRA_paper_18287.pdf (accessed 25.05.2015).pl_PL
dc.referencesFehr E., Schmidt K. (2006), The economics of fairness, reciprocity and altruism – experimental evidence and new theories, In: S.C. Kolm, J.M. Ythier (eds.), Handbook of the economics of giving, altruism and reciprocity, vol. 1, Elsevier Publishing, Amsterdam, p. 615–691.pl_PL
dc.referencesGarbarino E., Slonim R. (2009), The robustness of trust and reciprocity across a heterogeneous US population, “Journal of Economic Behavior Organization” 69(3), p. 226–240.pl_PL
dc.referencesGlaeser E., Laibson D., Scheinkman J., Soutter C. (2000), Measuring trust, “Quarterly Journal of Economics” 115(3), p. 811–846.pl_PL
dc.referencesGrowiec K. (2011), Kapitał społeczne: geneza i społeczne konsekwencje, SWPS Academic Publishing, Warsaw.pl_PL
dc.referencesGüth W., Schmittberger R., Schwarze B. (1982), An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 3(4), p. 367–388.pl_PL
dc.referencesIsaac M., Walker J. (1988), Group size effects in public goods provision: The voluntary contribution mechanism, Quarterly Journal of Economics 103, 179–199.pl_PL
dc.referencesJohnson N. D., Mislin A.A. (2011), Trust games: A meta-analysis, Journal of Economic Psychology 32(5), p. 865–889.pl_PL
dc.referencesMarkowska-Przybyła U., Ramsey D. M. (2014), A game theoretical study of generalised trust and reciprocation in Poland: I. Theory and experimental design, Operations Research and Decisions 24(3), p. 59–76.pl_PL
dc.referencesMarkowska-Przybyła U., Ramsey D. M. (2015), A game theoretical study of generalised trust and reciprocation in Poland: II. A description of the study group, “Operations Research and Decisions” 25(2), p. 51–73.pl_PL
dc.referencesMigheli M. (2012), Assessing trust through social capital? A possible experimental answer, “American Journal of Economics and Sociology” 71(2), p. 298–327.pl_PL
dc.referencesPlatje J. (2011), Institutional capital: creating capacity and capabilities for sustainable development, University of Opole Publishing, Opole.pl_PL
dc.referencesPoznańska J., Poznański K. (2015), Comparison of patterns of convergence among “emerging markets” of Central Europe, Eastern Europe and Central Asia, “Comparative Economic Research” 18(1), p. 5–23.pl_PL
dc.referencesPutnam R.D., Leonardi R., Nanetti R.Y. (1994), Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA.pl_PL
dc.referencesSchwarz G. (1978), Estimating the dimension of a model. “Annals of Statistics” 6(2), p. 461–464.pl_PL
dc.referencesVyrastekova J., Onderstal S. (2005), The trust game behind the veil of ignorance: A note on gender differences, “CentER Discussion Paper”; vol. 2005–96, Tilburg: Microeconomics.pl_PL
dc.referencesZak P.J., Knack S. (2001), Trust and Growth, “The Economic Journal” 111(470), p. 295–321.pl_PL
dc.referencesZak P.J., Kurzban R., Matzner W.T. (2005), Oxytocin is associated with human trustworthiness, “Hormones and Behaviour” 48(5), p. 522–527.pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorEmailump@ue.wroc.pl
dc.contributor.authorEmaildavid.ramsey@pwr.edu.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/0208-6018.323.01
dc.relation.volume4en_GB
dc.subject.jelC72


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record