Pokaż uproszczony rekord

Foreign Direct Investments Induced Innovation? A Case Study − Macedonia

dc.contributor.authorApostolov, Micoen
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-13T10:45:37Z
dc.date.available2016-06-13T10:45:37Z
dc.date.issued2016-04-15en
dc.identifier.issn1508-2008en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/18313
dc.description.abstractFrom the beginning of the transition process, foreign direct investments have been a priority, an essential pillar that moves the society forward towards a developed market economy. In addition, as the influx of capital increases it inevitably brings with it increased innovation. Hence we examine the possibility that these two indicators have a positive and upward ascent and facilitate the development of the economy.en
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegoen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesComparative Economic Research;19en
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.en
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0en
dc.subjectFDIen
dc.subjectinnovationen
dc.subjectSoutheast Europeen
dc.subjectMacedoniaen
dc.titleForeign Direct Investments Induced Innovation? A Case Study − Macedoniaen
dc.page.number5-25en
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationAssoc. Prof., Ph.D, University Goce Delcev, Macedoniaen
dc.referencesAitken B., G. H. Hanson, et al. (1997). Spillovers, foreign investment, and export behavior. ‘Journal of International Economics’ 43(1-2): 103-132. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1996(96)01464-Xen
dc.referencesAitken B., A. Harrison, et al. (1996). Wages and foreign ownership A comparative study of Mexico, Venezuela, and the United States.’ Journal of International Economics’ 40(3-4): 345-371. doi: 10.1016/0022-1996(95)01410-1en
dc.referencesAitken B. J. and A. E. Harrison (1999). Do Domestic Firms Benefit from Direct Foreign Investment? Evidence from Venezuela. ‘American Economic Review’ 89(3): 605-618. doi: 10.1257/aer.89.3.605en
dc.referencesApostolov M. (2011). Governance and Enterprise Restructuring: The Case of Macedonia. ‘Transition Studies Review’ 18(2): 299-309.en
dc.referencesApostolov M. (2013). Governance and enterprise restructuring in Southeast Europe: gross domestic product and foreign direct investments. ‘Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society’ 13(4): 431-438.en
dc.referencesBandick R., H. Görg, et al. (2014). Foreign Acquisitions, Domestic Multinationals, and R&D. ‘The Scandinavian Journal of Economics’ 116(4): 1091-1115. doi: 10.1111/sjoe.12071 ThomsonISI: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000342739200007&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=b7bc2757938ac7a7a821505f8243d9f3en
dc.referencesBarrios S., H. Görg, et al. (2011). Spillovers through backward linkages from multinationals: Measurement matters! ‘European Economic Review’ 55(6): 862-875. doi: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2010.10.002 ThomsonISI: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000293727300008&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=b7bc2757938ac7a7a821505f8243d9f3en
dc.referencesBlalock G. and P. J. Gertler (2008). Welfare gains from Foreign Direct Investment through technology transfer to local suppliers. ‘Journal of International Economics’ 74(2): 402-421. doi: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2007.05.011 ThomsonISI: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000254678800009&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=b7bc2757938ac7a7a821505f8243d9f3en
dc.referencesBlomström M. and F. Sjöholm (1999). Technology transfer and spillovers: Does local participation with multinationals matter? ‘European Economic Review’ 43(4-6): 915-923. doi: 10.1016/S0014-2921(98)00104-4en
dc.referencesBranstetter L. and K. Saggi (2011). "Intellectual Property Rights, Foreign Direct Investment and Industrial Development*." The Economic Journal 121(555): 1161-1191. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2011.02440.x ThomsonISI: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000294934600010&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=b7bc2757938ac7a7a821505f8243d9f3en
dc.referencesCohen B. I. (1973). Comparative Behavior of Foreign and Domestic Export Firms in a Developing Economy. ‘The Review of Economics and Statistics’ 55(2): 190-197. doi: 10.2307/1926993en
dc.referencesCriscuolo C., J. E. Haskel, et al. (2010). Global engagement and the innovation activities of firms. ‘International Journal of Industrial Organization’ 28(2): 191-202. doi: 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2009.07.012 ThomsonISI: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000275073900008&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=b7bc2757938ac7a7a821505f8243d9f3en
dc.referencesDjankov S. and P. Murrell (2002). Enterprise Restructuring in Transition: A Quantitative Survey. ‘Journal of Economic Literature’ 40(3): 739-792. doi: 10.1257/jel.40.3.739en
dc.referencesEtzkowitz H. (1993). Enterprises from science: The origins of science-based regional economic development. ‘Minerva’ 31(3): 326-360. doi: 10.1007/BF01098626en
dc.referencesEtzkowitz H., Leydesdorff, L. (1995). The Triple Helix---University-Industry-Government Relations: A Laboratory for Knowledge-Based Economic Development. ‘EASST Review’ 14(1): 14-19.en
dc.referencesFors G. (1997). Utilization of R&D Results in the Home and Foreign Plants of Multinationals. ‘The Journal of Industrial Economics’ 45(3): 341-358. doi: 10.1111/1467-6451.00052en
dc.referencesFriedman M. (2007). The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits. [in:] Corporate Ethics and Corporate Governance. W. Zimmerli, M. Holzinger and K. Richter, Springer (eds) Berlin Heidelberg: 173-178.en
dc.referencesGlass A. J. and K. Saggi (1999). Foreign Direct Investment and the Nature of R&D. ‘The Canadian Journal of Economics / Revue canadienne d'Economique’ 32(1): 92-117. doi: 10.2307/136397 ThomsonISI: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000297159200016&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=b7bc2757938ac7a7a821505f8243d9f3en
dc.referencesGorodnichenko Y., Svejnar, J and Terrell, K. (2007). When Does FDI Have Positive Spillovers? Evidence from 17 Emerging Market Economies. ‘Centre for Economic Policy Research’, London.en
dc.referencesGreenaway D., R. Hine, et al. (2000). Further evidence on the effect of foreign competition on industry level wages. ‘Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv’ 136(3): 522-538. doi: 10.1007/BF02707292en
dc.referencesHall R. E. and C. I. Jones (1999). Why do Some Countries Produce So Much More Output Per Worker than Others? ‘The Quarterly Journal of Economics’ 114(1): 83-116. doi: 10.1162/003355399555954en
dc.referencesHaskel J. E., S. C. Pereira, et al. (2007). Does Inward Foreign Direct Investment Boost the Productivity of Domestic Firms? ‘Review of Economics and Statistics’ 89(3): 482-496. doi: 10.1162/rest.89.3.482 ThomsonISI: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000370059200003&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=b7bc2757938ac7a7a821505f8243d9f3en
dc.referencesHowenstine N. G. and W. J. Zeile (1992). Foreign Direct Investment in the United States: Establishment Data for 1987. ‘Survey of Current Business(October)’: 44-58.en
dc.referencesJensen M. C. (2010). The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and the Failure of Internal Control Systems. ‘Journal of Applied Corporate Finance’ 22(1): 43-58. ‘Journal of Political Economy’ 98(2): 225-264. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6622.2010.00260.xen
dc.referencesKathuria V. (2000). Productivity spillovers from technology transfer to Indian manufacturing firms. ‘Journal of International Development’ 12(3): 343-369. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1328(200004)12:3<343::AID-JID639>3.0.CO;2-R ThomsonISI: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000270506600003&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=b7bc2757938ac7a7a821505f8243d9f3en
dc.referencesKeay I. (2000). Canadian manufacturers' relative productivity performance, 1907-1990. ‘Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique’ 33(4): 1049-1068. doi: 10.1111/0008-4085.00053en
dc.referencesKeller, W. (2000). Do Trade Patterns and Technology Flows Affect Productivity Growth? ‘World Bank Economic Review’ 14(1): 17-47. doi: 10.1093/wber/14.1.17en
dc.referencesKeller W. and S. R. Yeaple (2009). Multinational Enterprises, International Trade, and Productivity Growth: Firm-Level Evidence from the United States. ‘Review of Economics and Statistics’ 91(4): 821-831. doi: 10.1162/rest.91.4.821 ThomsonISI: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000271254500011&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=b7bc2757938ac7a7a821505f8243d9f3en
dc.referencesKokko A. (1994). Technology, market characteristics, and spillovers. ‘Journal of Development Economics’ 43(2): 279-293. doi: 10.1016/0304-3878(94)90008-6en
dc.referencesKonings J. (2001). The effects of foreign direct investment on domestic firms. ‘Economics of Transition’ 9(3): 619-633. doi: 10.1111/1468-0351.00091en
dc.referencesLa Porta R., F. Lopez-De-Silanes, et al. (1999). Corporate Ownership Around the World. ‘The Journal of Finance’ 54(2): 471-517. doi: 10.1111/0022-1082.00115en
dc.referencesLeydesdorff L. (2013). Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. [in:] Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship. E. Carayannis, Springer New York (eds.): 1844-1851.en
dc.referencesLeydesdorff L. and M. Meyer (2010). The decline of university patenting and the end of the Bayh- Dole effect. ‘Scientometrics’ 83(2): 355-362. doi: 10.1007/s11192-009-0001-6 ThomsonISI: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000276499500002&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=b7bc2757938ac7a7a821505f8243d9f3en
dc.referencesLowe C. U. (1982). The triple helix--NIH, industry, and the academic world. ‘Yale J Biol Med’ 55(3-4): 239-246.en
dc.referencesNelson R. R. (1991). Why do firms differ, and how does it matter? ‘Strategic Management Journal’ 12(S2): 61-74. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250121006en
dc.referencesNickell S. J. (1996). Competition and Corporate Performance. ‘Journal of Political Economy’ 104(4): 724-746. doi: 10.1086/262040en
dc.referencesSabato J. A., M. Mackenzie, et al. (1982). La Producción de Tecnología: Autónoma o Transnacional, Instituto Latinoamericano de Estudios Transnacionales.en
dc.referencesSchumpeter J. A. (2013). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, Taylor & Francis.en
dc.referencesSmarzynska Javorcik B. (2004). The composition of foreign direct investment and protection of intellectual property rights: Evidence from transition economies. ‘European Economic Review’ 48(1): 39-62. doi: 10.1016/S0014-2921(02)00257-Xen
dc.referencesWillmore L. N. (1986). ‘The comparative performance of foreign and domestic firms in Brazil. ‘World Development’ 14(4): 489-502. doi: 10.1016/0305-750X(86)90065-3en
dc.contributor.authorEmailmico.apostolov@ugd.edu.mken
dc.identifier.doi10.1515/cer-2016-0001en


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail
Nazwa:
cer-2016-0001.pdf
Rozmiar:
774.9KB
Format:
PDF
Oglądaj/Otwórz

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.