Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorMaksim, Monika
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-29T07:40:41Z
dc.date.available2016-02-29T07:40:41Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.identifier.issn0208-6018
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/17128
dc.description.abstractActive labour market policies are still one of the major tools to fight unemployment and improve functioning of the labour market. However, growing scepticism regarding the effects of active policies and very different evaluation findings are the main reason of growing interest in developing the evalution methods of these policies. The paper outlines the key theoretical issues concerning ALMP evaluation and also intends to explain the need of evaluation of these measures, especially in countries which have just joined European Union, for example Poland. The first part describes evaluation purposes nad briefly characterizes differences between various types of evaluation. The second part covers the methodological aspects of ALMP microevalutions, defines the fundamental evaluation problem and reviews some quasiexperimental methods, commonly used in the EU -15, like before-after designs, matching and parametric regression, and conditional difference in differences estimation, uderlying their strenths and weaknesses.The last part of the article presents some problems of ALMP evaluation in Poland. The paper concludes that the main barriers of implementing evaluation system in Poland are: the lack of funds to conduct systematic evaluations, bad procedures and poorly developed information systems used by public employment services, low quality or the lack of proper statistical data needed for evaluations, and insufficient qualifications of PES’ employees to control and evaluate the effects of ALMP.pl_PL
dc.description.sponsorshipZadanie pt. „Digitalizacja i udostępnienie w Cyfrowym Repozytorium Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego kolekcji czasopism naukowych wydawanych przez Uniwersytet Łódzki” nr 885/P-DUN/2014 zostało dofinansowane ze środków MNiSW w ramach działalności upowszechniającej naukę.pl_PL
dc.language.isoplpl_PL
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl_PL
dc.relation.ispartofseriesActa Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Oeconomica;213
dc.titleWybrane problemy oceny aktywnych programów rynku pracypl_PL
dc.typeArticlepl_PL
dc.rights.holder© Copyright by Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź 2007pl_PL
dc.page.number237-256pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu, Katedra Gospodarowania Zasobami Pracypl_PL
dc.referencesAshenfelter O. (1978), Estimating the Effect of Training Program on Earning,” The Review of Economics and Statistics”, No. 60.pl_PL
dc.referencesAuer P., Kruppe T. (1996), Monitoring of Labour Market Policy in EU Memb er States, (w:) G. Schmid, J. O’Reilly, K. Schömann (red.), International Handbook of Labour Market Policy and Evaluation, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.pl_PL
dc.referencesBeilmann L., Jackman R. (1996), Aggregate Impact Analysis, (w:) G. Schmid, J. O’Reilly, K. Schömann (red.), International Handbook of Labour Market Policy and Evaluation, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.pl_PL
dc.referencesDelander L., Niklasson H. (1996), Cost-henefit Analysis, (w:) G. Schmid, J. O’Reilly, K. Schömann (red.), International Handbook of Labour Market Policy and Evaluation, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.pl_PL
dc.referencesEuropean Comission (2003), Evaluating Socio Economic Development, Sourcebook I: Active Labour Mark et Policies, Przewodnik Komisji Europejskiej z zakresu ewaluacji, http://www.evalsed.info.pl_PL
dc.referencesFraker T., Maynard R. (1987), The Adequacy of Comparison Group Designs for Evaluations of Employment-Related Programs, “Journal of Human Resources”, Vol.22, No.2.pl_PL
dc.referencesFredriksson P., Johansson P. (2003), Program Evaluation and Random Program Starts, Department of Economics, Uppsala University “Working Paper”, No. 1.pl_PL
dc.referencesFriedlander D., Robins P .K.. (1995), Evaluating Program Evaluations: New Evidence on Commonly Used Nonexperimental Methods, “The American Economic Review”, Vol. 85, No. 4.pl_PL
dc.referencesGUS, Bezrobocie rejestrowane I-III kwartał 2005 r., Warszawa 2005.pl_PL
dc.referencesHeckman J.J, Robb R. (1985), Alternative Methods for Evaluating the Impact of Interventions, (w:) J.J. Heckman, B. Singer (red.), Longitudinal Analysis of Labor Market Data, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.pl_PL
dc.referencesHeckman J.J., Smith J.A. (1996), Experimental and Nonexperimental Evaluation, (w:) G. Schmid, J. O’Reilly, K. Schömann (red.), International Handbook of Labour Market Policy and Evaluation, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.pl_PL
dc.referencesHeckman J.J., Lalonde R.J., Smith J.A. (1999), The Economics and Econometrics of Active Labor Market Programs, (w:) O. Ashenfelter, D. Card (red.), Handbook of Labor Economics, North Holland, Amsterdam.pl_PL
dc.referencesKluve J., Lehmann H., Schmidt Ch. M. (2000), Disentangling Treatment Effects of Polish Active Labor Market Policies: Evidence from Matched Samples, Preliminary Draft.pl_PL
dc.referencesKoning J. de, Mosley H. (2002), How can active policies be made more effective?, (w:) Schmid G., Gazier B.(red.), The Dynamics of Full Employment. Social Integration Through Transitional Labour Markets, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.pl_PL
dc.referencesKubiak P. (2005), Efekty uczestnictwa bezrobotnych w aktywnych programach rynku pracy w Polsce, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Lódź.pl_PL
dc.referencesKwiatkowski E. (1998), Aktywna polityka państwa na rynku pracy w Polsce, (w:) E. Kryńska, E. Kwiatkowski, H. Zarychta, Polityka państw a na rynku pracy w Polsce w latach dziewięćdziesiątych, IPiSS, Warszawa.pl_PL
dc.referencesKwiatkowski E., Tokarski T. (1997), Efekty polityki państwa wobec rynku pracy w Polsce. Analiza na podstawie funkcji do pasowań, “Ekonomista”, nr 3.pl_PL
dc.referencesLalonde R.J. (1986), Evaluating the Econometric Evaluations of Training Programs with Experimental Data, “American Economic Review”, No.76.pl_PL
dc.referencesLechner M. (2001), Identification and estimation of causal effects of multiple treatments under the conditional independence assumption, (w:) M. Lechner, F. Pfeiffer (red.), Econometric Evaluation of Labour Market Policies,” ZEW Economic Studies”, No. 13, Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg.pl_PL
dc.referencesManski C.F. (1989), Anatomy of the Selection Problem, “Journal of Human Resources”, No. 24.pl_PL
dc.referencesMartin J.P., Grubb D. (2001), What works and for whom: Are view of OECD countries’ experiences with active labour market policies, “Swedish Economic Policy Review”, No. 8.pl_PL
dc.referencesMoffit R. (1991), Program Evaluation with Nonexperimental Data, “Evaluation Review”, No. 15.pl_PL
dc.referencesMinisterstwo Gospodarki i Pracy, Polska 2004. Raport o rynku pracy oraz zabezpieczeniu społecznym, http://www.praca.gov.pl (04. 2005).pl_PL
dc.referencesOECD (1995), Employment Outlook, Paris.pl_PL
dc.referencesO’Leary Ch., Nesporova A., Samorodov A. (2001), Manual on Evaluation of Labour Market Policies in Transition Economies, ILO, Geneva.pl_PL
dc.referencesOrr L.L.,(1999), Social Experiments. Evaluating Public Programs with Experimental Method, Sage Publications, London.pl_PL
dc.referencesPierre G. (1999), A framework for active laour market policy evaluation, ILO Geneva, „Employment and Training Papers”, No. 49.pl_PL
dc.referencesPuhani P. (1999a), Evaluating Acitve Labour Market Policies. Empirical Evidence for Poland During Transition, “ZEW Economic Studies”, No. 5, Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg.pl_PL
dc.referencesPuhani P. (1 999b), Estimating the Effects of Public Training on Polish Unemployment by Way of the Augmented Matching Function Approach, ZEW Mannheim, „Discussion Paper”, No. 38.pl_PL
dc.referencesPurdon S. (2002), Estimating the Impact of Labour Market Programmes, Department for Work and Pensions, London.pl_PL
dc.referencesPurdon S., Lessof C., Woodfield K., Bryson C. (2001), Research Methods For Policy Evaluation, National Centre for Social Research, “Research Working Paper “, No. 2.pl_PL
dc.referencesRosenbaum P.R., Rubin D. B. (1983), The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects, “Biometrica”, No. 70.pl_PL
dc.referencesRossi P.H., Lipscy M.W„ Freeman H.E. (2003), Evaluation: A Systematic Approach, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.pl_PL
dc.referencesRubin D.B (1974), Estimating Causal Effects of Treatments In Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies, “Journal of Educational Psychology”, Vol.66, No.5.pl_PL
dc.referencesRubin D.B. (1980), Comment on Basu, D.: Randomization Analysis of Experimental Data: The Fisher Randomization Test, “Journal of the American Statistical Association”, No. 75.pl_PL
dc.referencesSchmid G., O’Reilly J., Schömann K. (1996), Theory and Methodology of Labour Market Policy and Evaluation: An Introduction (w:) G. Schmid, J. O’Reilly, K. Schömann (red.), International Handbook of Labour Market Policy and Evaluation, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham 1996.pl_PL
dc.referencesSmith J.A. (2000), A Critical Survey of Empirical Methods for Evaluating Active Labor Market Policies, “Zeitschrift Für Volkswirschaft und Statistik”, Vol. 136(3).pl_PL
dc.referencesSpeckesser S. (2004), Essays on Evaluation of Active Labour Market Policy, Doctoral dissertation, Mannheim University, Mannheim.pl_PL
dc.referencesWorld Bank (2002), Impact Evaluation. Techniques for Evaluating Active Labor Market Programs, “Employment Policy Primer”, No.2.pl_PL
dc.referencesWUP w Poznaniu (1995), Analiza efektywności programów rynku pracy-poradnik, Poznań.pl_PL


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord