dc.contributor.author | Picz, Damian | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-12-17T10:47:46Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-12-17T10:47:46Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
dc.identifier.citation | D. Picz, Certificate of proficiency in English course evaluation and students’ preparation to writing in real-life situations – descriptive study, [in:] FLOW. Foreign Language Opportunities in Writing, eds. J. Majer, Ł. Salski, Łódź University Press, Łódź 2011, p. 145–173. | pl_PL |
dc.identifier.isbn | 978-83-7525-564-5 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11089/15692 | |
dc.description.abstract | The aim of this article is to present results of a case study carried out as a partial fulfilment for a Master Thesis. The case study referred to one of the parts of Cambridge Certificate of Proficiency in English. The Paper 2 includes Part 1, where a learner is required to complete a compulsory task such as an article, essay or a letter, and Part 2, in which a candidate is free to choose from four questions with diversified text types. Moreover, in CPE Paper 2 one can find a reflection of the social approach and as in all questions role of the reader is specified. Thus, a candidate knows to what type of a discourse community they have to write. What is also determined is the role of the writer and the purpose of writing in a breadth of task types. A candidate and their linguistic competence at this level could be compared to the ones of an educated native speaker. Therefore, they should be able to adjust their language register to a variety of culturally appropriate ways required to fulfil every task. Thus, the aim of the study was to observe whether a Certificate of Proficiency in English course prepares students to real-life writing outside a classroom context. For the purpose of MA dissertation a case study was conducted on a small group of students participating in a course at a private school of foreign languages. | pl_PL |
dc.language.iso | en | pl_PL |
dc.publisher | Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego | pl_PL |
dc.relation.ispartof | “FLOW. Foreign Language Opportunities in Writing”, eds. J. Majer, Ł. Salski, Łódź University Press, Łódź 2011; | |
dc.title | Certificate of proficiency in English course evaluation and students’ preparation to writing in real-life situations – descriptive study | pl_PL |
dc.type | Book chapter | pl_PL |
dc.rights.holder | © Copyright by Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź 2011 | pl_PL |
dc.page.number | [145]-173 | pl_PL |
dc.contributor.authorAffiliation | University of Opole. | pl_PL |
dc.contributor.authorBiographicalnote | Damian Picz completed his MA in 2007 at the University of Opole, Poland. He is presently a lecturer in the Department of Applied Linguistics and he is a Ph.D. student. His teaching interests writing testing and assessment, language learning anxiety, writing apprehension, washback effect, among others. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Adams, R. 1981. “The reliability of marking of five June 1980 examinations.” Mimeo: Associated Examining Board, Guildford. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Cushing Weigle, S. 2002. Assessing writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Francis, J. C. 1977. Impression and analytic marking methods. Mimeo, MS Aldershot: Associated Examining Board. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Hamp-Lyons, L. 1991. “Pre-text: Task-related influences on the writer.” In L. Hamp-Lyons (ed.), Assessing second language writing in academic contexts. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Huot, B. 1996. “Toward a new theory of writing assessment.” College Composition and Communication, 47, 549-66. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Hyland, K. 2002. Teaching and researching writing. Harlow: London. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Hyland, K. 2003. Second language writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Jacobs, H., Zinkgraf, S., Wormuth, D., Hartfiel, V. and J. Hughey. 1981. Testing ESL composition: A practical approach. Rowley, MA: Newbury House. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Krashen, S. 1993. The power of reading: Insights from the research. Englewood: Libraries Unlimited. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Lloyd-Jones, R. 1977. “Primary trait scoring.” In Cooper, C. R. and Odell, L. (eds.), Evaluating writing: 33-69. NY: National council of Teachers of English. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Matsuda, P. K. 2003. “Second language writing in the twentieth century: A situated historical perspective.” In Kroll, B. (ed.) Exploring the dynamics of second language writing. Cambridge: University Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | McNamara, T. F. 1996. Measuring second language performance. London and New York: Longman. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Porter, J. E. 1992. Audience and rhetoric: An archaeological composition of the discourse community. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Swales, J. M. 1990. Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | pl_PL |
dc.references | Weir, C. J. 1990. Communicative language testing. NJ: Prentice Hall Regents. | pl_PL |
dc.references | White, E. M. 1994. Teaching and assessing writing: Recent advances in understanding, evaluating and improving student performance. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. | pl_PL |