Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPicz, Damian
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-17T10:47:46Z
dc.date.available2015-12-17T10:47:46Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.citationD. Picz, Certificate of proficiency in English course evaluation and students’ preparation to writing in real-life situations – descriptive study, [in:] FLOW. Foreign Language Opportunities in Writing, eds. J. Majer, Ł. Salski, Łódź University Press, Łódź 2011, p. 145–173.pl_PL
dc.identifier.isbn978-83-7525-564-5
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/15692
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this article is to present results of a case study carried out as a partial fulfilment for a Master Thesis. The case study referred to one of the parts of Cambridge Certificate of Proficiency in English. The Paper 2 includes Part 1, where a learner is required to complete a compulsory task such as an article, essay or a letter, and Part 2, in which a candidate is free to choose from four questions with diversified text types. Moreover, in CPE Paper 2 one can find a reflection of the social approach and as in all questions role of the reader is specified. Thus, a candidate knows to what type of a discourse community they have to write. What is also determined is the role of the writer and the purpose of writing in a breadth of task types. A candidate and their linguistic competence at this level could be compared to the ones of an educated native speaker. Therefore, they should be able to adjust their language register to a variety of culturally appropriate ways required to fulfil every task. Thus, the aim of the study was to observe whether a Certificate of Proficiency in English course prepares students to real-life writing outside a classroom context. For the purpose of MA dissertation a case study was conducted on a small group of students participating in a course at a private school of foreign languages.pl_PL
dc.language.isoenpl_PL
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl_PL
dc.relation.ispartof“FLOW. Foreign Language Opportunities in Writing”, eds. J. Majer, Ł. Salski, Łódź University Press, Łódź 2011;
dc.titleCertificate of proficiency in English course evaluation and students’ preparation to writing in real-life situations – descriptive studypl_PL
dc.typeBook chapterpl_PL
dc.rights.holder© Copyright by Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź 2011pl_PL
dc.page.number[145]-173pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniversity of Opole.pl_PL
dc.contributor.authorBiographicalnoteDamian Picz completed his MA in 2007 at the University of Opole, Poland. He is presently a lecturer in the Department of Applied Linguistics and he is a Ph.D. student. His teaching interests writing testing and assessment, language learning anxiety, writing apprehension, washback effect, among others.pl_PL
dc.referencesAdams, R. 1981. “The reliability of marking of five June 1980 examinations.” Mimeo: Associated Examining Board, Guildford.pl_PL
dc.referencesCushing Weigle, S. 2002. Assessing writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesFrancis, J. C. 1977. Impression and analytic marking methods. Mimeo, MS Aldershot: Associated Examining Board.pl_PL
dc.referencesHamp-Lyons, L. 1991. “Pre-text: Task-related influences on the writer.” In L. Hamp-Lyons (ed.), Assessing second language writing in academic contexts. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.pl_PL
dc.referencesHuot, B. 1996. “Toward a new theory of writing assessment.” College Composition and Communication, 47, 549-66.pl_PL
dc.referencesHyland, K. 2002. Teaching and researching writing. Harlow: London.pl_PL
dc.referencesHyland, K. 2003. Second language writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Jacobs, H., Zinkgraf, S., Wormuth, D., Hartfiel, V. and J. Hughey. 1981. Testing ESL composition: A practical approach. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.pl_PL
dc.referencesKrashen, S. 1993. The power of reading: Insights from the research. Englewood: Libraries Unlimited.pl_PL
dc.referencesLloyd-Jones, R. 1977. “Primary trait scoring.” In Cooper, C. R. and Odell, L. (eds.), Evaluating writing: 33-69. NY: National council of Teachers of English.pl_PL
dc.referencesMatsuda, P. K. 2003. “Second language writing in the twentieth century: A situated historical perspective.” In Kroll, B. (ed.) Exploring the dynamics of second language writing. Cambridge: University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesMcNamara, T. F. 1996. Measuring second language performance. London and New York: Longman.pl_PL
dc.referencesPorter, J. E. 1992. Audience and rhetoric: An archaeological composition of the discourse community. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.pl_PL
dc.referencesSwales, J. M. 1990. Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesWeir, C. J. 1990. Communicative language testing. NJ: Prentice Hall Regents.pl_PL
dc.referencesWhite, E. M. 1994. Teaching and assessing writing: Recent advances in understanding, evaluating and improving student performance. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.pl_PL


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record