http://hdl.handle.net/11089/4372 Sat, 04 Apr 2026 07:37:31 GMT 2026-04-04T07:37:31Z https://dspace.uni.lodz.pl:443/bitstream/id/e400dbc0-997a-421c-ac4b-517438756ab5/ http://hdl.handle.net/11089/4372 http://hdl.handle.net/11089/4589 Bajki funkcjonalistów Skalski, Tadeusz One of the most controversial principles of contemporary functionalism is the so-called principle of organizational invariance. Roughly speaking it states that all systems with the same fine grained functional organization have the same conscious experience. The author of this article tries to show that the principle leads to absurdity. Sat, 01 Jan 2011 00:00:00 GMT http://hdl.handle.net/11089/4589 2011-01-01T00:00:00Z http://hdl.handle.net/11089/4588 Własności i prawa przyrody w esencjalizmie dyspozycyjnym Wodzisz, Rafał The aim of this paper is to articulate dispositonal essentialism (DE) as a viable position in the discussions considering properties and laws of nature. In the first part of the article there are given several "must have" trades of properties in DE. They are followed by the conceptions themselves. The last part of the article brings a little insight about ceteris paribus laws in DE. Sat, 01 Jan 2011 00:00:00 GMT http://hdl.handle.net/11089/4588 2011-01-01T00:00:00Z http://hdl.handle.net/11089/4587 Faktualizm Davida Armstronga Firszt, Dawid In my article I present David Armstrong's stance on properties, relations, particulars and states of affairs. I introduce this categories to show, at the most general level, his metaphysical system called factualism. My article consists of four parts, in each one I characterize following categories: 1. Properties 2. Relation 3. Particulars 4. States of affairs. I also discuss Armstrong's arguments considering the nature of those categories and their role in his philosophy. Also, I try to emphasis differences between Armstrong's factualism and other contemporary metaphysical positions (Bundle theory and Trop theory). Sat, 01 Jan 2011 00:00:00 GMT http://hdl.handle.net/11089/4587 2011-01-01T00:00:00Z http://hdl.handle.net/11089/4586 Zasady intelektualizmu Drozdowicz, Zbigniew In the view, which is proposed here, intellectualism is what brings together and not what divides, and its rules are placed in some manner over every distinction. This means, that intellectualism is being treated by me as a collective work. Its most early versions occurred along the occurrence of first philosophers. Later on, they were often corrected, perfected or also so immensely changed, that under more than one condition they varied from the originals. Many philosophers took part in the making of this work, but some had a lesser and some greater influence. To those, who significantly contributed to its emergence and functioning in European philosophy and science, there belonged such authors like Socrates, Descartes, and Popper. Sat, 01 Jan 2011 00:00:00 GMT http://hdl.handle.net/11089/4586 2011-01-01T00:00:00Z