Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorZajkowski, Robert
dc.contributor.authorDomańska, Ada
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-13T09:37:15Z
dc.date.available2019-10-13T09:37:15Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn0208-6018
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/30567
dc.description.abstractThe interrelations between engagement in CSR activities and the company’s performance are still one of pivotal managerial problems. Ample findings related to this issue seem to reveal a rather hazy than clear picture. In this paper, an attempt has been made to complement this problematic issue with the results of the survey conducted among a group of Polish large and medium‑sized family businesses. The aim of the paper is to analyse relationships between the self‑assessment of the company’s performance and its engagement in various CSR activities. It seems to be interesting to identify what kind of relationship and mutual influences can be found between the company’s economic and non‑economic activities and whether its value aspects, in their broad meaning, exist. To identify this relationship, two groups of linear regression models were adopted (CSR activities or the self‑assessment of the company’s performance as dependent variables). The ultimate conclusion drawn seems to confirm that the problematic area mentioned above should be described rather by a circular than linear direction of influences which were called a multilevel chain of interferences.  en_GB
dc.description.abstractWspołzależności między zaangażowaniem przedsiębiorstw w rożnorodną działalność związaną ze społeczną odpowiedzialnością biznesu (Corporate Social Responsibility – CSR) a ich wynikami są jednymi z ważniejszych kwestii badawczych i praktycznych. Liczne wyniki badań w tym obszarze wydają się prowadzić do rozbieżnych konkluzji, wskazując zarowno na istnienie korelacji dodatnich, jak i ujemnych. W artykule podjęto probę uzupełnienia luki badawczej o wyniki badań przeprowadzonych na grupie polskich średnich i dużych przedsiębiorstw. W tym celu wykorzystane zostały adekwatne modele regresji liniowej, w ktorych z jednej strony rolę zmiennych objaśnianych pełniły aktywności ukierunkowane na CSR, z drugiej natomiast prezentujące samoocenę efektow ekonomicznych przedsiębiorstw. Sformułowane wnioski pozwoliły potwierdzić, że związki te, jeżeli występują, mają raczej charakter cyrkularny (tzw. wielowymiarowy łańcuch powiązań) niż przyczynowo‑skutkowy.pl_PL
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegoen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesActa Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Oeconomica; 343
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.en_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/en_GB
dc.subjectfamily businessesen_GB
dc.subjectCSRen_GB
dc.subjectCompany’s Finance Performanceen_GB
dc.subjectCorporate Social Performanceen_GB
dc.subjectprzedsiębiorstwa rodzinnepl_PL
dc.subjectCSRpl_PL
dc.subjectwyniki finansowe przedsiębiorstwpl_PL
dc.subjectspołeczne zaangażowanie przedsiębiorstwpl_PL
dc.titleThe Directions of Interrelations Between the Company’s Performance and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Activitiesen_GB
dc.title.alternativeKierunki współzależności między wynikami przedsiębiorstw a zaangażowaniem w działania z zakresu społecznej odpowiedzialności biznesu (CSR)pl_PL
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.page.number211-233
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationMaria Curie-Skłodowska University in Lublin, Faculty of Economics, Department of Banking
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationMaria Curie-Skłodowska University in Lublin, Faculty of Economics, Department of Banking
dc.identifier.eissn2353-7663
dc.referencesArnold M. F. (2008), Non‑Financial Performance Metrics For Corporate Responsibility Reporting Revisited, A Doughty Centre for Corporate Responsibility Working Paper, Cranfield School of Management, Cranfield.en_GB
dc.referencesBanerjee S. B. (2000), Whose Land is it Anyway? National Interest, Indigenous Stakeholders, and Colonial Discourses, “Organization & Environment”, no. 13, pp. 3–38.en_GB
dc.referencesBarnett M. L. (2007), Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social response, “Academy of Management Review”, no. 32(3), pp. 794–816.en_GB
dc.referencesBaron R. A., Franklin R. J., Hmieleski K. M. (2016), Why entrepreneurs often experience low, not high, levels of stress: The joint effects of selection and psychological capital, “Journal of Management”, no. 42(3), pp. 742–768.en_GB
dc.referencesBonaventura J. M.G., Silva S. da, Bandeira‑de‑Mello R. (2012), Corporate Financial Performance and Corporate Social Performance: Methodological Development and the Theoretical Contribution of Empirical Studies, “Revista Contabilidade & Finanças”, no. 23(60), pp. 232–245.en_GB
dc.referencesBowen H. R. (1953), Social Responsibilities of the Businessman, Harper, New York.en_GB
dc.referencesBrammer S., Millington A. (2008), Does it pay to be different? An analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance, “Strategic Management Journal”, vol. 29, no. 12, pp. 1325–1343.en_GB
dc.referencesBrilman J. (2002), Nowoczesne koncepcje i metody zarządzania, Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne, Warszawa.en_GB
dc.referencesCampbell J. L. (2007), Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility, “Academy of Management Review”, no. 32(3), pp. 946–967en_GB
dc.referencesChuang C. H., Jackson S. E., Jiang Y. (2016), Can knowledge‑intensive teamwork be managed? Examining the roles of HRM systems, leadership, and tacit knowledge, “Journal of Management”, no. 42(2), pp. 524–554.en_GB
dc.referencesCommission Recommendation 2003/361/EC of 6 May 2003 concerning the definition of micro, small and medium‑sized enterprises (2003), OJ L 124 of 20.05.2003.en_GB
dc.referencesCorporate Social Responsibility. A Business Contribution to Sustainable Development (2002), Commission of the European Communities, Brussels, 2.07.2002 COM(2002) 347.en_GB
dc.referencesCriticisms or Drawbacks of Profit Maximization Objectives (2012), https://accountlearning.blogspot.com/2012/12/criticisms-or-drawbacks-of-profit.html [accessed: 26.03.2016].en_GB
dc.referencesCrossan K. (2005), The Theory of the Firm and Alternative Theories of Firm Behaviour: A Critique, “International Journal of Applied Institutional Governance”, vol. 1, issue 1, pp. 1–13.en_GB
dc.referencesDahlsrud A. (2006), How Corporate Social Responsibility is Defined: an Analysis of 37 Definitions, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, “Wiley Inter Science”, pp. 1–13, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/csr.132 [accessed: 29.04.2017].en_GB
dc.referencesDiSogra C., Callegaro M. (2009), Computing response rates for probability‑based web panels, [in:] Proceedings of the Joint Statistical Meetings, Survey Research Methods section [CD‑ROM].en_GB
dc.referencesGodfrey P., Merrill C., Hansen J. (2009), The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: an empirical test of the risk management hypothesis, “Strategic Management Journal”, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 425–445.en_GB
dc.referencesGruszecki T. (2002), Współczesne teorie przedsiębiorstwa, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.en_GB
dc.referencesGrzegorzewska‑Ramocka E. (2009), Cele ekonomiczne i społeczne przedsiębiorstwa, “Gospodarka Narodowa”, no. 7–8, pp. 59–78.en_GB
dc.referencesHong B., Li Z., Minor D. (2016), Corporate governance and executive compensation for corporate social responsibility, “Journal of Business Ethics”, no. 136(1), pp. 199–213.en_GB
dc.referencesHoogendoorn A. W., Daalmans J. (2009), Nonresponse in the Recruitment of an Internet Panel Based on Probability Sampling, “Survey Research Methods”, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 59–72.en_GB
dc.referencesHow to Measure Performance: A Handbook of Techniques and Tools (1995), U.S. Department of Energy, Washington.en_GB
dc.referencesHussain W. (2012), Corporations, Profit Maximization and The Personal Sphere, “Economics and Philosophy”, no. 28, pp. 311–331.en_GB
dc.referencesJermier J. M., Forbes L. C., Benn S., Orsato R. J. (2006), The New Corporate Environmentalism and Green Politics, [in:] S. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. Lawrence, W. R. Nord (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Organization Studies, Sage, London, pp. 618–650.en_GB
dc.referencesKlein S. B. (2000), Family Businesses in Germany: Significance and Structure, “Family Business Review”, no. 13(3), pp. 157–182.en_GB
dc.referencesKomorowski K. (2011), Cele i wartości współczesnego przedsiębiorstwa. Ujęcie behawioralne, Oficyna Wydawnicza SGH, Warszawa.en_GB
dc.referencesKowal D. (2013), Koncepcja zarządzania wartością przedsiębiorstwa w perspektywie współczesnych wyzwań rozwojowych podmiotów gospodarczych, „Zeszyty Naukowe Wyższej Szkoły Zarządzania i Bankowości w Krakowie”, no. 27, pp. 1–14.en_GB
dc.referencesKozłowska A. (2006), Alternatywne teorie zachowania przedsiębiorstw, [in:] D. Kopycińska (ed.), Zachowania decyzyjne podmiotów gospodarczych, Wydawnictwo Printgroup, Szczecin, pp. 25–41.en_GB
dc.referencesLaitinen E. K., Gin C. (2006), How Do Small Companies Measure Their Performance?, “Problems and Perspectives in Management”, no. 4(3), pp. 49–68.en_GB
dc.referencesLederer B. (2008), Platforms for data quality progress: The client’s guide to rapid improvement of online research, RFL Communications, Skokie.en_GB
dc.referencesLewicka B., Misterek W. (2013), Features of an Innovative Company in the Opinion of the Business Entities and the Business Environment Institutions, [in:] Active Citizenship by Knowledge Management & Innovation: Proceedings of the Management, Knowledge and Learning International Conference 2013, To Know Press, Zadar, pp. 577–584, http://www.toknowpress.net/ISBN/978-961-6914-02-4/papers/ML13-294.pdf [accessed: 29.04.2017].en_GB
dc.referencesLongo M., Mura M., Bonoli A. (2005), Corporate social responsibility and corporate performance: the case of Italian SMEs, “Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society”, no. 5(4), pp. 28–42.en_GB
dc.referencesMattingly J. E., Berman S. (2006), Measurement of corporate social action: discovering taxonomy in the Kinder Lydenburg Domini ratings data, “Business and Society”, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 20–46.en_GB
dc.referencesMishra S., Damodar S. (2010), Does corporate social responsibility influence firm performance of Indian companies?, “Journal of Business Ethics”, no. 95(4), pp. 571–601.en_GB
dc.referencesMoneva J. M., Rivera‑Lirio J. M., Muñoz‑Torres M. J. (2007), The corporate stakeholder commitment and social and financial performance, “Industrial Management & Data Systems”, no. 107(1), pp. 84–102.en_GB
dc.referencesNoga A. (2009), Teorie przedsiębiorstw, Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne, Warszawa.en_GB
dc.referencesOrlitzky M., Schmidt F. L., Rhynes S. L. (2003), Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta‑Analysis, “Organization Studies”, no. 24(3), pp. 403–441.en_GB
dc.referencesPeloza J. (2009), The Challenge of Measuring Financial Impacts From Investments in Corporate Social Performance, “Journal of Management”, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 1518–1541.en_GB
dc.referencesRadin T., Calkins M. (2006), The Struggle against Sweatshops: Moving toward Responsible Global Business, “Journal of Business Ethics”, no. 66, pp. 261–272.en_GB
dc.referencesRobertson C., Watson A. (2004), Corruption and change: The impact of foreign direct investment, “Strategic Management Journal”, no. 25, pp. 385–396.en_GB
dc.referencesSalzmann O., Ionescu‑Somers A., Steger U. (2005), The business case for corporate sustainability: literature review and research options, “European Management Journal”, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 27–36.en_GB
dc.referencesSmith N. C., Lenssen G. (2009), Mainstreaming Corporate Responsibility: An Introduction, [in:] N. C. Smith, G. Lenssen (eds.), Mainstreaming Corporate Responsibility, Wiley, West Sussex, pp. 2–8.en_GB
dc.referencesStaudt S., Shao C. Y., Dubinsky A. J., Wilson P. H. (2014), Corporate Social Responsibility, Perceived Customer Value, and Customer‑ Based Brand Equity?: A Cross‑National Comparison, “Journal of Strategic Innovation and Sustainability”, no. 10(1), pp. 65–87.en_GB
dc.referencesWallace J. C., Butts M. M., Johnson P. D., Stevens F. G., Smith M. B. (2016), A multilevel model of employee innovation: Understanding the effects of regulatory focus, thriving, and employee involvement climate, “Journal of Management”, no. 42(4), pp. 982–1004.en_GB
dc.referencesWeber M. (2008), The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: A Company‑Level Measurement Approach for CSR, “European Management Journal”, no. 26(4), pp. 247–261.en_GB
dc.referencesZajkowski R. (2015), Corporate Social Responsibility in medium and big sizes Polish family and non‑family businesses, [in:] G. Hofbauer et al. (eds.), Challenges, Research and Perspectives, Europäische Forschung‑ und Arbeitsgruppeuni‑edition, Berlin, pp. 115–129.en_GB
dc.contributor.authorEmailrobert.zajkowski@umcs.lublin.pl
dc.contributor.authorEmailada.domanska@umcs.pl
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/0208-6018.343.13
dc.relation.volume4en_GB
dc.subject.jelC21en_GB
dc.subject.jelL25en_GB
dc.subject.jelM14en_GB


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.