Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMierzejewski, Dominik
dc.contributor.editorMierzejewski, Dominik
dc.identifier.citationMierzejewski D., Socio-economic stability, intra party democracy and the power transition in the Communist Party of China, [w:] Dimensions of Development. East Asia in the Process of Changes, Mierzejewski D. (red.), Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź 2013, s. 141-153, doi: 10.18778/7525-935-3.13pl_PL
dc.description.abstractThe article mainly aims to discuss the critical factors of power transition within the Chinese Communist Party framework since the last peaceful transition between Jiang Zemin and Hu Jintao. The major objective of the paper is to show when and how the changes in leadership came about. Moreover, the issues to answer have been: how have the historical experiences such as the Tiananmen crisis, the further opening-up in 1992 or economic performance affected the political transition in Mainland China? What kind of internal determinants have played a crucial role in a venerable or peaceful succession? The major issue to discuss is how economic performance might challenge the issue of peaceful transition at the central level.pl_PL
dc.description.sponsorshipUdostępnienie publikacji Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego finansowane w ramach projektu „Doskonałość naukowa kluczem do doskonałości kształcenia”. Projekt realizowany jest ze środków Europejskiego Funduszu Społecznego w ramach Programu Operacyjnego Wiedza Edukacja Rozwój; nr umowy: POWER.03.05.00-00-Z092/17-00.pl_PL
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl_PL
dc.relation.ispartofMierzejewski D. (red.), Dimensions of Development. East Asia in the Process of Changes, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź 2013;
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe*
dc.subjectsocio-economic stabilitypl_PL
dc.subjectintra party democracypl_PL
dc.subjectpower transitionpl_PL
dc.subjectCommunist Party of Chinapl_PL
dc.titleSocio-economic stability, intra party democracy and the power transition in the Communist Party of Chinapl_PL
dc.typeBook chapterpl_PL
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniversity of Lodzpl_PL
dc.referencesBi Jianhai (2003). “The Chinese leadership succession: does it complete or continue?”. New Zealand International Review, 28: 2.pl_PL
dc.referencesBi Jianhai (2008). “Political Transition in China”. New Zealand International Review, 33: 17.pl_PL
dc.referencesChina Leadership Completes Transition as President Hu Assumes Military. URL: < N=79366672&jsessionid=de303d5224f0c4ca1e6e5e1cab6d4e1b6941> [accessed January 28, 2009)pl_PL
dc.referencesDittmer L. (2003). Chinese Leadership Succession to the Fourth Generation. In Lin Gang and Hu Xiaobo (eds.) China After Jiang. Stanford: Stanford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesDittmer L. (1990). “Patterns of Elite Strife and Succession in Chinese Politics”. The China Quarterly, 14: 425.pl_PL
dc.referencesEaston D. (1979). A Systems Analysis of Political Life. University of Chicago Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesFewsmith J. (1994). Dilemmas of Reform in China: Political Conflict and Economic Debate. Armonk, New York, London: An East Gate Book.pl_PL
dc.referencesFewsmith J. (2001). China since Tiananmen: The Politics of Transition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesFewsmith J. (2004). Promoting the Scientific Development Concept. China Leadership Monitor, 11. URL: <> [accessed February 1, 2012].pl_PL
dc.referencesFuchun Wang. (2003). Waishi guanli xue gailun (An introduction to the Foreign Affairs Administration). Beijing Daxue Guojiguanxi Xueyuan Xili Jiaocai.pl_PL
dc.referencesGoldstein A. (1991). From Bandwagon to Balance-Of-Power Politics: Structural Constraints and Politics in China, 1949–1978, Stanford: Stanford University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesGuo Baogang, Sustaining Political Legitimacy in the Post-Jiang China: Challenges Ahead, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia Marriott Hotel, Philadelphia, PA, Aug 27, 2003. URL: <> [accessed August 23, 2012].pl_PL
dc.referencesHarding H. (1987). China’s Second Revolution, Reform after Mao. Washington: The Brooking Institution.pl_PL
dc.referencesHsiao Pen (1999). Separating the Party from the Government. In: Carol Lee Hamrin, Suisheng Zhao & A. Barnett Doak (eds.), Decision-Making in Deng’s China: Perspectives from Insiders. Armonk, New York, N.Y.: A East Gate Book.pl_PL
dc.referencesJie Chen, Peng Deng (1995). China since the Cultural Revolution. From Totalitarism to Authoritarism. London: Prager.pl_PL
dc.referencesJing Huang (2000). Factionalism in Chinese Communist Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesLi Wenling (2003). Zhongguo zhengfu zhineng chuanbian wenti baogao (China Government Function Change Issue Report). Beijing: Zhongguo Fazhan Chuban She.pl_PL
dc.referencesMiller Lyman H. (2003). The 10th National People’s Congress and China Leadership Transition. China Leadership Monitor, 7: 1-3.pl_PL
dc.referencesNathan A. & Gilley B. (2002). China’s New Rulers, The Secret Files. New York: New York Review Books.pl_PL
dc.referencesShambaugh D. (2008). China’s Communist Party, Atrophy and Adaptation. Woodrow Wilson Press Centre, Washington, Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesTang Xiaoqing (2009). Dang nei minzhu yu Dang de xianjinxing shi hudong gong jin guanxi (The intra-party democracy and party’s progress are interactive) URL: <> [accessed February 5, 2012].pl_PL
dc.referencesTanner M. S. (1999). The Politics of Lawmaking In Post Mao China. Oxford: Clarendon Press.pl_PL
dc.referencesWilly Wo-Lap Lam (2007). “Chinks in the Armour of the Hu Jintao Administration”. China Perspective, 3: 4-11.pl_PL
dc.referencesXie Zhiqiang, Pan Jia (2008). Dangzheng lingdao ganbu dui 2007-2008 nian Zhongguo shehui xingshi de jiben kanfa (Basic Options of the Leading Cadres on China’s Social Situation of 2007-2008), In: Zhongguo shehui xingshi fenxi yu yuce. Shehui Kexue Wenxuan Chubanshe, Beijing.pl_PL
dc.referencesYang D. L. (2003). “Leadership Transition and the Political Economy of Governance”. Asian Survey, 43: 27-28.pl_PL

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Międzynarodowe