Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLewicka-Strzałecka, Anna
dc.description.abstractThe paper shows that conflicts of interest in science undermine its ethos. Some examples of this phenomenon have been analysed from the point of view of its destructive consequences. The need to counter them has also been identified in our country and some legal regulations and self-regulation are gradually being introduced. However, they are not always respected in practice. In the last part of the paper, a model of management of risk of bias in scientific research has been outlined. The main thesis says that an awareness of conflict of interest embracing both knowledge of the general issues and relevant assessment of the personal risk of lack of objectivism should be an ethical minimum of every scientific worker.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipPublication of English-language versions of the volumes of the "Annales. Ethics in Economic Life" financed through contract no. 501/1/P-DUN/2017 from the funds of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education devoted to the promotion of scholarship.en_GB
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegoen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAnnales. Ethics in Economic Life; 6
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.en_GB
dc.subjectconflict of interesten_GB
dc.subjectfunding effecten_GB
dc.subjectethical standarden_GB
dc.subjectethos of scienceen_GB
dc.titleAwareness of conflict of interest as an academic standard of ethicsen_GB
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationPolish Academy of Sciences, Institute of Philosophy and Sociology
dc.referencesBarnes, D. E., & Bero, L. A. (1998). Why review articles on the health effects of passive smoking reach different conclusions. Journal of American Medical Association, 279(19), 1566–1570.en_GB
dc.referencesBekelman, J. E., Li, Y., & Gross, C. P. (2003). Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research: A systematic review. Journal of American Medical Association, 289(4), 454–465.en_GB
dc.referencesBest Practices in Review Procedures [Dobre praktyki w procedurach recenzyjnych w nauce].,1.htmlen_GB
dc.referencesCarrick-Hagenbarth, J., & Epstein, G. A. (2012). Dangerous interconnectedness: Economists’ conflicts of interest, ideology and financial crisis. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 36(1), 43–63.en_GB
dc.referencesGrabski, M. W. (2009). Uczciwość i wiarygodność nauki. Praktyka. Nauka, 2, 37–59.en_GB
dc.referencesJaskulowski, K. (2013). The judge in his own case? Letter from prof. K. Jaskułowski about reviews of National Program for the Development of Humanities.
dc.referencesKrimsky, S. (2006). Nauka skorumpowana? (B. Biały, Trans.). Warszawa: Państwowy Instytut Wydawniczy [original title: Science in the private interest: Has the lure of profits corrupted biomedical research?]en_GB
dc.referencesLewicka-Strzałecka, A. (2012). Konflikt interesów. In W. Gasparski (Ed.), Biznes, etyka, odpowiedzialność (pp. 249–288). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.en_GB
dc.referencesLewicka-Strzałecka, A. (2017). Świadomość konfliktu interesów jako akademicki standard etyczny. Annales. Ethics in Economic Life, 20(1), 7–16.en_GB
dc.referencesMerton, R. K. (1982). Teoria socjologiczna i struktura społeczna (J. Żurawski & E. Morawska, Trans.). Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.en_GB
dc.referencesThe Polish Academy of Science. (2012, December 13). The Ethics code of a researcher, Annex to Act No. 10 of the General Assembly of the Polish Academy of Science.
dc.referencesvom Saal, F. S., Nagel, S. C., Timms, B. G., & Welshons, W. V. (2005). Implications for human health of the extensive Bisphenol. A Literature showing adverse effects at low doses: A response to attempts to mislead the public. Toxicology, 212(2–3), 244–252.en_GB
dc.referencesSupreme Audit Office. (2011). Information on the results of the audit “Wykorzystanie środków publicznych na naukę”. KNO-4101-08-00/2011, No. 162/2012/P/11/070/KNO.,4361,vp,6190.pdfen_GB
dc.referencesTurner, C., & Spilich, G. J. (1997). Research into smoking or nicotine and human cognitive performance: Does the source of funding make a difference? Addiction, 92(11), 1423–1426.en_GB
dc.referencesWiens, C., & Cota, A. (2009). Lecturer conflicts of interest in medical school education: Raising the bar in BC. BC Medical Journal, 51(4), 162–163. cation-raising-bar-bcen_GB
dc.referencesWilson R. A. (1966). Feminine forever. New York: M. Evans & Co.en_GB
dc.referencesWriting Group for the WHI Investigators (2002). Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results from the Women’s Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. Journal of American Medical Association, 288(3), 321–333.en_GB

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.