Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorStoiński, Andrzej
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-26T13:16:28Z
dc.date.available2019-02-26T13:16:28Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn1899-2226
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/26887
dc.description.abstractThe paper refers to selected issues of exploitation in the face of justice. The analysis is based on the definitions of exploitation contained in the Polish Penal and Civil Codes. The main goal is the identification of the necessary and sufficient conditions for the recognition of exploitation as being unjust. A supplementary question will refer to a specific type of justice which should be considered in this case. In this respect, we should consider retributive, distributive and social justice. Another important factor in this regard is the accepted theory of value. In the presented considerations, we will focus on the labour theory of value. The principal issue can be expressed by the questions whether exploitation is ipso facto unjust and how the phenomena of exploitation and justice are related to each other.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipPublication of English-language versions of the volumes of the "Annales. Ethics in Economic Life" financed through contract no. 501/1/P-DUN/2017 from the funds of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education devoted to the promotion of scholarship.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegoen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAnnales. Ethics in Economic Life;6
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.en_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0en_GB
dc.subjectethicsen_GB
dc.subjectjusticeen_GB
dc.subjectexploitationen_GB
dc.titleExploitation in the face of justiceen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.page.number99-110
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniversity of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Faculty of Humanities, Institute of Philosophy
dc.identifier.eissn2353-4869
dc.referencesAjdukiewicz, K. (1960). O sprawiedliwości. In Język i poznanie (vol. 1). Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.en_GB
dc.referencesAristotle. (1818). Nicomachean Ethics. In The Rhetoric, Poetic, and Nicomachean Ethics of Aristotle (T. Taylor, Trans.). London: James Black & Sons.en_GB
dc.referencesAristotle. (1996). Nicomachean Ethics [Etyka nikomachejska] (D. Gromska, Polish trans.). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.en_GB
dc.referencesAristotle. (2005). Politics [Polityka] (L. Piotrowicz, Polish trans.). Wrocław: Ossolineum, DeAgostini.en_GB
dc.referencesBöhm-Bawerk, E. (1957). Capital and interest: A critical history of economic theory (W. A. Smart, Trans.). New York: Kelly & Millan.en_GB
dc.referencesBöhm-Bawerk, E. (2007). Karl Marx and the close of his system. Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute.en_GB
dc.referencesBrighouse, H. (2007). Sprawiedliwość (S. Królak, Trans.). Warszawa: Sic!en_GB
dc.referencesKant, I. (1981). Grounding for the metaphysics of morals (J. Ellington, Trans.). Indianapolis: Hackett.en_GB
dc.referencesKodeks cywilny, Dz.U. z 1964r. Nr 16, poz. 93 z późn. zm. (Civil Code, Journal of Laws 1964. No. 16, item 93 as amended).en_GB
dc.referencesLandreth, H., & Colander D. C. (2005). Historia myśli ekonomicznej (A. Szeworski, Trans.). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.en_GB
dc.referencesMarx, K. (2007). Capital: A critique of political economy (Vol. 1). New York: Cosimo.en_GB
dc.referencesNozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, state, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.en_GB
dc.referencesRawls, J. (2009). A theory of justice. London: Harvard University Press.en_GB
dc.referencesRothbard, M. N. (2015). The ethics of liberty. New York University Press.en_GB
dc.referencesde Soto, J. H. (2010). Teoria efektywności dynamicznej. In Sprawiedliwość a efektywność (pp. 9–62). Warszawa: Fijorr Publishing.en_GB
dc.referencesStephenson, M. A. (1972). The paradox of value: A suggested interpretation. History of Political Economy, 4(1), 127–139.en_GB
dc.referencesStoiński, A. (2014). Wyzysk w perspektywie sprawiedliwości. Annales. Etyka w Życiu Gospodarczym, 17(3), 31–42.en_GB
dc.referencesWyzysk w prawie cywilnym. (2012). openlaw.pl. http://www.openlaw.com.pl/wikka.php?wakka=Wyzysken_GB
dc.referencesZiembiński, Z. (1996). Sprawiedliwość społeczna jako pojęcie prawne. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Sejmowe.en_GB
dc.contributor.authorEmailandrzej.stoinski@gmail.com
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1899-2226.20.6.07
dc.relation.volume20en_GB
dc.subject.jelB51
dc.subject.jelB53
dc.subject.jelZ13


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.